Search Results for "contingent contract"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "contingent contract"

197 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 197 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Industrial Dispute Reference Due to Procedural Irregularity in Conciliation Initiation Under Industrial Disputes Act

27 Jan 2026

The Supreme Court allowed the civil appeal filed by Appellants challenging the reference of industrial dispute to Industrial Court, Aurangabad -- The ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Port Development Dispute — Liquidated Damages Claim Rejected Due to Lack of Proof of Actual Loss. The court held that under Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, proof of actual loss is necessary for claiming liquidated damages, and the arbitrator's finding was not patently illegal.

10 Dec 2013

The petitioner, Board of Trustees for Jawaharlal Nehru Port, a body corporate under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, entered into a licence agreement ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Restrain Encashment of Bank Guarantees in Arbitration Dispute — No Case of Fraud or Irreparable Injury Established. Court held that bank guarantees are independent contracts and injunction can only be granted in exceptional circumstances of fraud or special equity, which were not made out.

11 Jan 2018

The petitioner, Felguera Gruas India Pvt. Ltd. (FGIPL), filed six arbitration petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996,...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell BDA Allotted Site Within Prohibited Period Held Unlawful. Court sets aside decree for specific performance as the agreement violated Rule 18(2) of the Bangalore Development Authority (Allotment of Sites) Rules, 1972, which prohibited alienation for ten years.

18 Jan 2022

The case involves a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a site allotted by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA). The first defe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Leave to Defend in Summary Suit for Recovery of Rs. 8.67 Crores Based on Share Buyback Agreement — Triable Issues Raised Regarding Non-Performance of Conditions Precedent and Liability of Defendant. The court held that where the claim is for liquidated damages for breach of a buyback agreement, it may not be a liquidated demand under Order 37 CPC, and the defendant is entitled to unconditional leave to defend if triable issues are raised.

19 Oct 2005

The plaintiff, Niskalp Investments & Trading Company Ltd., filed a summary suit under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the defen...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows Union of India's Appeal Against High Court Directions on Regularization Policy and Post Sanction. The Court Set Aside the Direction to Sanction Posts as Beyond Article 226 Jurisdiction but Upheld the Directive to Reformulate Policy and Grant Minimum Basic Pay to Part-Time Daily Wagers with 20 Years of Service.

7 Oct 2021

The Supreme Court of India addressed appeals filed by the Union of India and others against a judgment of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Government Contract Dispute Despite Non-Exhaustion of Pre-Arbitration Procedure. Party Autonomy and Minimal Judicial Intervention Upheld Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

28 Nov 2025

The appellant, Hindustan Construction Company Ltd., was awarded a contract by the respondent, Bihar Rajya Pul Nirman Nigam Ltd. (BRPNNL), on 04.03.201...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petitions for Non-Compliance with Statutory Notice Under Section 434 of Companies Act, 1956. Statutory notice requirement under Section 434(1)(a) held mandatory and cannot be waived by agreement between parties.

7 Jul 2006

The petitioner, Dolphin Investment Pvt. Ltd., filed two company petitions under Section 433(e) and (f) of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking winding up ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — No Patent Illegality Found. Arbitrator's Interpretation of Contractual Clauses Held Plausible and Not Open to Interference.

3 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust, challenged an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, before the B...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Supplier Against Western Coalfields Limited for Withholding Admitted Dues. Withholding of Payment Based on Vigilance Report Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice.

31 Mar 2017

The petitioner, Sujyoti India (P) Limited, a private limited company and authorized distributor of SKF India Limited, entered into a rate contract wit...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)