SALES TAX REFERENCE NO. 52 OF 2009
8 Feb 2019The matter came before the Bombay High Court as two sales tax references arising from the assessment of M/s. Radhasons International, a partnership fi...
Search Results for "consignment definition"
93 result(s) found
Found 93 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Seed Company, Upholds Consumer Status of Small Agriculturist in Buyback Dispute. Cultivation of Safed Musli for Livelihood Held Not Commercial Purpose Under Section 2(d) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
6 Mar 2020The case involves a dispute between M/s Nandan Biomatrix Ltd., a seed company, and S. Ambika Devi, a small landholder. In 2003, the appellant advertis...
- 145
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax TDS Case — Liquor Vendors Are Not 'Buyers' Under Section 206C of Income Tax Act, 1961. Court holds that excise contractors acquiring arrack under state-controlled system are excluded from definition of 'buyer' under Explanation (a)(iii) of Section 206C.
12 Oct 2023The appeal arose from a dispute under Section 206C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, concerning tax collection at source on the sale of alcoholic liquor. T...
- 364
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Jurisdiction of Customs Settlement Commission Under Sections 127A and 127B of the Customs Act, 1962 in Ten Writ Petitions. Whether Settlement Commission’s Authority Extends Beyond Short Levy Due to Misclassification to Cases Involving Fraud Is the Central Question.
21 Jul 2005The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard ten writ petitions together, all involving a common legal question concerning the jurisdiction of the Set...
- 14
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Duty Demand on Jewellery Exports from SEZ — Held that goods manufactured in SEZ and exported are not liable to customs duty under Section 2(23) of the Customs Act, 1962 read with SEZ Act, 2005. The court ruled that the SEZ Act, 2005 is a complete code and overrides the Customs Act, and the demand of duty was contrary to the scheme of the SEZ Act.
19 Nov 2022The petitioners, M/s. Renaissance Global Limited and M/s. Gold Star Jewellery Designs Pvt. Ltd., are companies engaged in the manufacture and export o...
- 26
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Customs Valuation Case — Sequential Application of Valuation Rules Mandatory. Rule 7 and Rule 9 of Customs Valuation Rules, 2007 Cannot Be Applied Without First Considering Rules 4 and 5 for Identical or Similar Goods.
22 Apr 2019The case involves appeals by M/s. Diyas Mantra Lighting Private Limited and its directors against orders of the Principal Commissioner of Customs (Pre...
- 183
High Court
Bombay High Court Rules Against Export Tax Exemption for Helium Gas Supplied to ONGC at Mumbai High. Sales to ONGC at Mumbai High Not Exports Under Section 5(1) Central Sales Tax Act as Mumbai High Is Not a Foreign Destination.
9 Jan 2012The case involves a sales tax reference under Section 61(4) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, arising from a decision of the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tr...
- 79
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Insurance Claim for Helicopter Damage During Transit — Storage and Assembly at Intermediate Point Held Within 'Ordinary Course of Transit' Under Marine Insurance Policy. The court affirmed that a transit marine insurance policy covers the entire journey from origin to final destination, including intermediate halts for assembly, and repudiation of claim amounts to deficiency in service.
1 Jan 2020The case involves a dispute between Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co Ltd (appellant) and the State of Madhya Pradesh (respondent) regarding a transi...
- 197
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Railway Stores (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1955 Case Due to Lack of Proof that Seized Articles Were Used or Intended for Railway Use. Conviction Under Section 3 Quashed as Prosecution Failed to Establish Goods Were 'Railway Stores' Under Section 2 of the Act.
2 Sep 1969Background: This criminal appeal arose from proceedings under the Railway Stores (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1955. The appellant, a private individual,...
- 63
High Court
High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Ministerial Order Reversing Market Fee Demand Under APMC Act. Imported Edible Oil Transaction Raises Questions of Agency and Marketing Under Section 31 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.
20 Jul 2015The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by the Mumbai Agricultural Produce Market Committee against the order of th...
- 115
