Search Results for "claims tribunal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "claims tribunal"

6076 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6076 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Appeal in Arbitration Case Upholding Arbitral Award. Challenge to Tribunal's Constitution Fails as 30-Day Appointment Period in Arbitration Agreement is Directory, Not Mandatory, Under Sections 16, 34, and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

11 Mar 2026

The dispute originated from a consultancy agreement dated 18 September 1995 between the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) and Respondent ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Food Corporation of India Against Railway Claims Tribunal Order Dismissing Claim for Non-Compliance of Section 80 CPC. Notice Under Section 80 CPC Not Required for Claims Before Railway Claims Tribunal as It Is Not a Civil Court.

7 Feb 2006

The Food Corporation of India (FCI) filed a suit in the Civil Court at Jalgaon on 15.10.1981 for recovery of Rs.30,125/- due to short delivery of 241 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award Rejecting Securities Claim on Grounds of Forum Shopping. Petitioners Contend That Regulatory Proceedings Against Clearing Member and Arbitration Against Depository Are Distinct, Allowing Simultaneous Pursuit Under Indemnity Principles.

23 Dec 2025

This matter arises from a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Petitions Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Against Interim Deposit Order. The Arbitral Tribunal Had Directed Joint and Several Deposit of Rs.190 Crores and Restraint on Property Alienation.

3 Jan 2019

The dispute arose from a Share Holders Agreement (SHA) dated 27 December 2012 and subsequent amendments between the Claimants (investors) and the Resp...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Insurer's Petition Challenging Warrant of Attachment for TDS Deduction on Interest Component of Motor Accident Compensation Award. The court held that the insurer's deduction of TDS under Section 194A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, though erroneous because the claimant was an individual entitled to exemption under Section 194A(3)(ix), did not justify attachment as the TDS amount was already deposited with the Income Tax Authority and the claimant could seek refund.

15 Nov 2016

The New India Assurance Company Limited (Petitioner) challenged an order dated 21 November 2014 passed by the Maharashtra Accident Claims Tribunal, Mu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Interim Order in Development Dispute — Upholds Disclosure Directions but Sets Aside Deposit Orders. The court held that while disclosure orders are permissible under Section 17 of the Arbitration Act, a direction to deposit 30% of sale proceeds without a finding of likelihood of dissipation of assets is not sustainable.

17 Dec 2024

The petitioners, Arun Bhoomi Corporation and Vijay Kanhaiyalal Joshi, filed a Commercial Arbitration Petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Industrial Tribunal Award in Wage Reference Due to Failure to Apply Settled Principles. The Court Remands the Proceedings for Fresh Adjudication, Holding That Both Region-cum-Industry and Parity Principles Were Not Properly Followed.

6 Dec 2006

This judgment from the Bombay High Court concerns three writ petitions challenging an award of the Industrial Tribunal in a wage reference between Hin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Seeking Directions to Motor Accidents Claims Tribunals for Compliance with Procedural Rules. Court Holds That Insistence on Personal Appearance of Claimants at Filing Is Not Mandatory Under Rule 254(2) of Maharashtra Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989.

21 Dec 2016

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by Anil Prabhakar Tadkalkar, a practicing advocate, raising several issues concerning the disposal of claim ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in ATM Cash Replenishment Dispute. The petition challenges the award of Rs. 23.26 crores to the respondent for cash loading discrepancies under the 2010 and 2015 agreements.

23 Dec 2025

The judgment originates from a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by Securitrans India Private Limited, see...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench heard a first appeal and writ petition concerning compensation for coal-bearing land and restoration of tribal land under Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974. The dispute centered on whether the Special Tribunal under Coal Bearing Areas Act could decide tribal status and restoration title, and whether the land remained agricultural after vesting under Section 9 of the Coal Bearing Areas Act.

18 Jul 2023

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Nagpur heard together a first appeal and a writ petition arising from a dispute over compensatio...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)