W.P.NOS.16428 OF 2025, 25868 OF 2024, 25869 OF 2024,
9 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "back door appointments"
106 result(s) found
Found 106 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Para-Teachers Seeking Regularisation in Jharkhand. Contractual Engagement Under Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan Does Not Confer Right to Absorption or Pay Parity with Regular Teachers.
7 May 2026The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of civil appeals filed by para-teachers engaged under the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA) in Jharkhand, challenging th...
- 537
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Class-IV Employees Terminated Due to Irregular Selection Process. Appointment Based on Interview Without Advertisement Provision Held Invalid; Termination Upheld as Selection Was De Hors the Rules.
7 Mar 2025The case pertains to a batch of appeals by employees appointed as Class-IV employees in Palamu district, Jharkhand, pursuant to an advertisement dated...
- 594
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Challenge to Counting of Contractual Service for Continuity in Tribal Training Institutes. Past Contractual Service Prior to Regularisation Must Be Counted for Continuity and Pensionary Benefits Except Monetary Benefits.
18 Jul 2023The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by the State of Maharashtra challenging the order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal dat...
- 13
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Irregularly Appointed Forest Officers in Seniority Dispute. Appointments Beyond Advertised Vacancies Held Illegal, Seniority Counts Only From Regularisation Date.
22 Apr 2019The case pertains to the seniority of Assistant Conservators of Forests (ACFs) in the Bihar Forest Service. The appellants were appointed on 13.04.198...
- 201
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Amendment Requiring Prior Approval for Transfer of School Management in Maharashtra. The Court held that Section 5A of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977, inserted by Maharashtra Act No. V of 2018, is constitutionally valid and does not violate Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.
21 Nov 2018The petitioners, various educational societies and institutions, challenged the constitutional validity of the Maharashtra Act No. V of 2018, which in...
- 71
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Section 24(6-A) CrPC Allowing Appointment of Private Advocates as Public Prosecutors in High Court — Provision Not Arbitrary or Discriminatory Against Government Prosecutors. The court held that the amendment does not violate Articles 14, 16, or 21 of the Constitution and that the State has the discretion to appoint any advocate for conducting cases in the High Court.
25 Jul 2017The petitioners, the Maharashtra State Public Prosecutors Association and several individual Assistant/Additional Public Prosecutors working in the co...
- 46
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Safai Kamacharis' Petition Against Arbitrary Termination by Municipal Corporation. Contractual Termination Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice and Right to Livelihood Under Article 21.
3 Dec 2015The petitioners, nineteen individuals, were working as safai kamacharis (sanitation workers) on a contract basis with the Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal C...
- 154
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Challenge to Government's Power to Nominate University Syndicate Members Under Karnataka State Universities Act, 2000. Section 39(1) Held Valid and Not Ultra Vires Sections 28(g) and 38 of the Act.
15 Jul 2013The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the validity of Section 39(1) of...
- 28
