Search Results for "affray"

19 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 19 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Blanket Prohibitory Order Under Section 144 CrPC in Bengaluru, Holds It Violative of Articles 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(b); Order Cancelling Protest Permissions Against CAA Struck Down as District Magistrate Failed to Apply Mind and Provide Material Facts.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions challenging an order dated 18 December 2019 issued by the District Magistrate-cum-Commissi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses State Appeal and Upholds Striking Down of State Government’s Power to Extend Section 144 Orders Beyond Two Months. Extension of Magisterial Orders by Executive Fiat Without Judicial Review Held Violative of Article 19(1)(b),(c),(d) and Not Saved by Reasonable Restrictions.

The dispute involved a constitutional challenge to the second part of section 144(6) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, which permitted the Stat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Food Adulteration Cases Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedures Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. Failure to Follow Section 47 and Rule 2.4.2 of the Manual of Procedures Renders Prosecution Invalid.

The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad, through a common judgment, allowed three criminal writ petitions challenging the validity of criminal proceedings...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Petitioners in Food Adulteration Case — No Offence Made Out Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. Sale of 'Mint' and 'Saunf' Products Not Prohibited Under Section 26(2)(i) of FSS Act, 2006 as They Are Not 'Food' as Defined.

The petitioners, Anand Ramdhani Chaurasia and Vijay Banarasi Chaurasia, were engaged in the business of selling 'Mint' and 'Saunf' products. On 12th J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Entry Ban Against Social Activist in Goa — Violation of Fundamental Rights Under Article 19(1)(d) and (e) of Constitution. Ban Order Passed Without Providing Opportunity of Hearing and Without Recording Subjective Satisfaction as Required Under Section 144 CrPC.

The petitioner, Pramod Mutalik, the leader of Sri Ram Sene, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging ...