Bombay High Court Quashes Charge-Sheet Against Candidate in Election Cash Seizure Case — No Offence Made Out Under Sections 171-H, 188 IPC and Section 123 of Representation of the People Act, 1950. Section 123 of the Act is a definition clause not creating penal liability, and Sections 171-H and 188 IPC require specific ingredients absent in the facts.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Sagar D. Meghe, was contesting parliamentary elections in 2014. During the election period, police at Dattapur Police Station set up a check point and intercepted a Scorpio vehicle driven by co-accused Manoj Dhatewar. The vehicle was used in the election campaign for the applicant's candidature. During search, police found cash of Rs.4.75 lakh, two liquor bottles, and election material in the form of stickers of the political party. The Tahsildar lodged a report, resulting in registration of Crime No.3026 of 2014. The police filed charge-sheet bearing SCC No.329 of 2014 for offences under Sections 171-H, 188 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 123 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950 (the Act). The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) seeking quashing of the charge-sheet. The court examined each penal provision invoked. Section 123 of the Act is not a penal provision but merely defines 'corrupt practices'. Section 171-H IPC requires that the accused voluntarily makes a payment of money or other gratification for the purpose of inducing a person to vote or refrain from voting, but there was no allegation that the applicant made any payment to any person. Section 188 IPC requires that there must be an order duly promulgated by a public servant and the accused must have knowledge of such order and disobey it, but there was no allegation of any order being promulgated or disobeyed. The court held that even if the prosecution case is accepted at its face value, none of the provisions would attract, and no prima facie case has been made out. The court allowed the application and quashed the charge-sheet.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Quashing of Charge-Sheet - Section 482 CrPC - Inherent Powers - The applicant sought quashing of charge-sheet for offences under Sections 171-H, 188 IPC and Section 123 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950 - Court examined each provision and found no prima facie case - Held that Section 123 of the Act is not a penal provision and Sections 171-H and 188 IPC do not apply on facts (Paras 3-6).

B) Election Law - Corrupt Practices - Section 123 Representation of the People Act, 1950 - Definition Clause - Section 123 of the Act merely defines 'corrupt practices' and does not create any penal offence - Held that no charge can be framed under this section (Para 6).

C) Indian Penal Code - Illegal Payments in Connection with Election - Section 171-H IPC - Ingredients - Section 171-H requires that the accused voluntarily makes a payment of money or other gratification for the purpose of inducing a person to vote or refrain from voting - In the present case, cash was seized from a vehicle used in election campaign but there is no allegation that the applicant made any payment to any person - Held that Section 171-H is not attracted (Para 6).

D) Indian Penal Code - Disobedience to Order Promulgated by Public Servant - Section 188 IPC - Ingredients - Section 188 requires that there must be an order duly promulgated by a public servant and the accused must have knowledge of such order and disobey it - In the present case, there is no allegation of any order being promulgated or disobeyed - Held that Section 188 is not attracted (Para 6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the charge-sheet against the applicant for offences under Sections 171-H, 188 IPC and Section 123 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950 should be quashed for lack of prima facie case.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the application and quashed the charge-sheet bearing SCC No.329 of 2014 arising out of Crime No.3026 of 2014 registered with Dattapur Police Station, District Amravati for the offences punishable under Sections 171-H, 188 IPC and Section 123 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950.

Law Points

  • Section 123 of the Representation of the People Act
  • 1950 is not a penal provision
  • Section 171-H IPC requires illegal payment in connection with election
  • Section 188 IPC requires disobedience to an order duly promulgated by public servant
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (BOM) (02) 258

Criminal Application No. 1575 of 2023

2024-02-08

Vinay Joshi, Mrs. Vrushali V. Joshi

2024:BHC-NAG:1940-DB

Shri S.V. Manohar, Senior Advocate a/w Shri Shantanu Khedkar Advocate for the applicant; Shri Doifode, Addl.P.P. for the State

Sagar D. Meghe

State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of charge-sheet.

Remedy Sought

The applicant sought quashing of charge-sheet SCC No.329 of 2014 arising out of Crime No.3026 of 2014.

Filing Reason

The applicant was contesting parliamentary elections in 2014; police intercepted a vehicle used in his campaign and seized cash, liquor bottles, and election material; charge-sheet was filed under Sections 171-H, 188 IPC and Section 123 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950.

Issues

Whether Section 123 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950 is a penal provision? Whether the ingredients of Section 171-H IPC are made out? Whether the ingredients of Section 188 IPC are made out?

Submissions/Arguments

Learned Senior Counsel Shri Manohar submitted that even if the prosecution case is accepted at its face value, none of the provisions would attract, meaning no prima facie case has been made out. Learned Senior Counsel took the court through the Sections invoked to impress that they do not fit in the facts of the case. Learned Senior Counsel submitted that Section 123 of the Act is not a punishable section but merely defines 'corrupt practices'; Section 77 of the Act requires candidates to maintain account of election expenses; Section 100(1)(b) of the Act provides ground for declaring election void.

Ratio Decidendi

Section 123 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950 is not a penal provision but merely defines 'corrupt practices'; Section 171-H IPC requires voluntary payment to induce voting, absent in this case; Section 188 IPC requires disobedience to a promulgated order, absent in this case. Hence, no prima facie case is made out, and the charge-sheet is liable to be quashed.

Judgment Excerpts

Section 123 of the Act is not a punishable Section, but it merely defines a term 'corrupt practices'. Section 171-H of the IPC requires that the accused voluntarily makes a payment of money or other gratification for the purpose of inducing a person to vote or refrain from voting. Section 188 of the IPC requires that there must be an order duly promulgated by a public servant and the accused must have knowledge of such order and disobey it.

Procedural History

The applicant filed Criminal Application No. 1575 of 2023 under Section 482 CrPC before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, seeking quashing of charge-sheet SCC No.329 of 2014 arising out of Crime No.3026 of 2014. The court admitted the matter and took it up for final disposal by consent of parties, delivering oral judgment on 08.02.2024.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 482
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 171-H, 188
  • Representation of the People Act, 1950: 123, 77, 100(1)(b)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Charge-Sheet Against Candidate in Election Cash Seizure Case — No Offence Made Out Under Sections 171-H, 188 IPC and Section 123 of Representation of the People Act, 1950. Section 123 of the Act is a definition clause not ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows State's Appeal Against Waiver of Sheriff's Poundage in Admiralty Suit — Sheriff Entitled to Poundage Even if Warrant Not Executed. Court Holds That Sheriff's Right to Poundage Accrues on Issuance of Warrant of Arrest, Not I...