Search Results for "adhyaksha"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "adhyaksha"

76 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 76 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes No-Confidence Motion Notice Against Gram Panchayat President for Violation of Mandatory Procedure Under Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. Notice Issued Without Prior Resolution of No-Confidence Motion by Gram Panchayat is Illegal and Arbitrary.

21 Jan 2025

The petitioner, Chethana A Channabasappa, the President of Hosahalli Gram Panchayat, challenged a notice dated 06.01.2025 issued by the Assistant Comm...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Gram Panchayat Adhyaksha. Court holds that the motion was validly passed by a majority of members and the petitioner failed to establish any procedural irregularity under the Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993.

6 Mar 2019

The petitioner, Smt. C. Pushpa, was the Adhyaksha of K. Bettahalli Gram Panchayat. A no-confidence motion was moved against her by the respondents, wh...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds No-Confidence Motion Against Adhyaksha of Gram Panchayat — Motion Valid Despite Absence of Prior Notice Under Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993.

6 Mar 2019

The petitioner, Smt. C. Pushpa, was the Adhyaksha (President) of K. Bettahalli Gram Panchayat. She filed a writ petition challenging a no-confidence m...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeal of Gram Panchayat President Challenging No-Confidence Motion — Motion Invalid as Notice Did Not Specify Meeting Date and Time Under Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. The court held that the mandatory requirement of specifying date and time in the notice was not complied with, rendering the no-confidence motion invalid.

8 Feb 2019

The appellant, Smt. Gopemma, was the President of Gram Panchayat Nirna. Certain members of the Gram Panchayat issued a notice of no-confidence motion ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes No-Confidence Motion Notice Against Gram Panchayat President Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Procedure Under Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. Motion signed by only 9 members instead of the required 10, and notice period of 15 days not provided.

28 Sep 2018

The petitioner, Smt. Roopa, was the President of Honnenahalli Gram Panchayat. The respondents 5 to 14, who were members of the Panchayat, moved a no-c...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Writ Petition Involving Zilla Panchayat Office Bearers. Multiple Individuals Filed Petition Against State Authorities Relating to Panchayat Raj Elections.

6 Jan 2017

...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing No Confidence Motion Notice Against Grama Panchayat President for Violation of Mandatory Hearing Requirement. Opportunity of hearing under Section 48(4) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 is mandatory before convening meeting to consider no confidence motion.

21 Oct 2014

The petitioner, Mrs. Chikkamuniyamma, was the President (Adhyaksha) of the Village Panchayat, K.Gollahalli Division-I. The third respondent, Smt. B. N...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Election Notice for President of Gram Panchayat Due to Non-Compliance with Rule 3(1A) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Conduct of Elections of Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha of Gram Panchayat) Rules, 1994 — Notice Issued Without Prior Publication of List of Members Entitled to Vote.

20 Feb 2014

The petitioners, members of Madiyanooru Gram Panchayat, challenged the election notice dated 7.2.2014 issued by the Prescribed Officer for the electio...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Election Notice for President of Gram Panchayat Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory 15-Day Notice Period Under Rule 3(1A) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Conduct of Elections of Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha of Gram Panchayat) Rules, 1994. The court held that the election intimation notice dated 7.2.2014 fixing election on 17.2.2014 violated the mandatory requirement of at least 15 days' notice.

20 Feb 2014

The case involves two writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the election intimation notice dated 7....

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes No-Confidence Motion Against Adhyaksha for Violation of Mandatory Debate Requirement. Failure to Allow Debate Under Rule 3(3) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Motion of No-Confidence against Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha of Grama Panchayat) Rules, 1994 Renders Motion Invalid.

31 Jan 2014

The petitioner, H.N. Nagaveni, was elected as Adhyaksha (President) of Palagatti Grama Panchayat on 17.12.2012. On 21.12.2013, 15 members of the Panch...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)