High Court of Karnataka Quashes Election Notice for President of Gram Panchayat Due to Non-Compliance with Rule 3(1A) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Conduct of Elections of Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha of Gram Panchayat) Rules, 1994 — Notice Issued Without Prior Publication of List of Members Entitled to Vote.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 110
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, members of Madiyanooru Gram Panchayat, challenged the election notice dated 7.2.2014 issued by the Prescribed Officer for the election to the post of President of the Gram Panchayat. The petitioners contended that the notice was issued without prior publication of the list of members entitled to vote, as required under Rule 3(1A) of the Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Conduct of Elections of Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha of Gram Panchayat) Rules, 1994. The court examined the rule and found that the requirement to publish the list before issuing the election notice is mandatory. Since the list was not published prior to the notice, the election notice was quashed. The court allowed the writ petitions and directed the respondents to proceed with the election in accordance with law, after complying with Rule 3(1A).

Headnote

A) Election Law - Gram Panchayat President Election - Rule 3(1A) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Conduct of Elections of Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha of Gram Panchayat) Rules, 1994 - Mandatory Requirement - The court held that the requirement under Rule 3(1A) to publish the list of members entitled to vote prior to issuing the election notice is mandatory. The election notice dated 7.2.2014 was quashed as the list was not published before the notice. (Paras 1-5)

B) Election Law - Gram Panchayat President Election - Rule 3(1A) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Conduct of Elections of Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha of Gram Panchayat) Rules, 1994 - Interpretation - The court interpreted Rule 3(1A) to mean that the list of members must be published before the election notice is issued, and non-compliance renders the notice invalid. (Paras 3-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the election notice dated 7.2.2014 issued by the Prescribed Officer for the election to the post of President of Madiyanooru Gram Panchayat is valid when the list of members entitled to vote was not published prior to the issuance of the notice, as required under Rule 3(1A) of the Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Conduct of Elections of Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha of Gram Panchayat) Rules, 1994.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petitions are allowed. The election intimation notice dated 7.2.2014 issued by the 1st respondent vide Annexure-C is quashed. The respondents are directed to proceed with the election to the post of President of Madiyanooru Gram Panchayat in accordance with law, after complying with the requirement of Rule 3(1A) of the Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Conduct of Elections of Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha of Gram Panchayat) Rules, 1994.

Law Points

  • Election law
  • Gram Panchayat
  • President election
  • Rule 3(1A) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Conduct of Elections of Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha of Gram Panchayat) Rules
  • 1994
  • Mandatory requirement
  • Prior publication of list of members
  • Quashing of election notice
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (02) 31

Writ Petition No.7197/2014 C/W W.P.Nos.8076-8086/2014 (LB-ELE)

2014-02-20

A.N. Venugopala Gowda

Sri Reuben Jacob, Sri G. Papi Reddy, Sri H.T. Narendra Prasad

K.V. Manjula and others

The Prescribed Officer & Assistant Executive Engineer, Zilla Panchayat, Mulabagalu and Madiyanooru Gram Panchayat

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging election notice for President of Gram Panchayat

Remedy Sought

Quashing of election intimation notice dated 7.2.2014 issued by the Prescribed Officer for election to the post of President of Madiyanooru Gram Panchayat

Filing Reason

Election notice was issued without prior publication of the list of members entitled to vote as required under Rule 3(1A) of the Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Conduct of Elections of Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha of Gram Panchayat) Rules, 1994

Issues

Whether the election notice dated 7.2.2014 is valid when the list of members was not published prior to the notice as required under Rule 3(1A) of the Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Conduct of Elections of Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha of Gram Panchayat) Rules, 1994

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the election notice was issued without prior publication of the list of members entitled to vote, violating Rule 3(1A) of the Rules. Respondents did not contest the petition; notice to respondent 2 was dispensed with.

Ratio Decidendi

The requirement under Rule 3(1A) of the Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Conduct of Elections of Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha of Gram Panchayat) Rules, 1994, to publish the list of members entitled to vote prior to issuing the election notice is mandatory. Non-compliance renders the election notice invalid and liable to be quashed.

Judgment Excerpts

The requirement under Rule 3(1A) of the Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Conduct of Elections of Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha of Gram Panchayat) Rules, 1994, to publish the list of members entitled to vote prior to issuing the election notice is mandatory. Since the list was not published prior to the notice, the election notice is quashed.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the election notice dated 7.2.2014. The court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 20.2.2014.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Conduct of Elections of Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha of Gram Panchayat) Rules, 1994: Rule 3(1A)
  • Constitution of India: Articles 226 and 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Accelerated Promotion for Degree-Holding Junior Engineers in Uttarakhand Irrigation Department. The court held that the 7.33% accelerated promotion quota for Degree-holders is valid under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution, ...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay Deliberates Whether Manager of Cooperative Bank Is Public Servant under Prevention of Corruption Act; Employee of Cooperative Bank Under Liquidation Challenges Dismissal of Discharge Application. The Court Examines the Scope of '...