Search Results for "Water Supply"

1580 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1580 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Corporation in Water Tax Levy Under UP Water Supply and Sewerage Act, 1975 - Reverses Refund Order. Water and Sewerage Tax Imposed on Premises is Valid as Tax on Lands and Buildings Under Entry 49 of List II, Not a Fee, Under Section 52(1)(a) of the Act.

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by the first respondent, Pradeshiya Industrial and Investment Corporation, challenging the levy of water ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Chief Secretary's Order in Water Release PIL for Kumbhmela. Court holds that release of water from Gangapur Dam for holy baths during drought must comply with Government Resolution prioritizing drinking water.

The petitioner, Hiralal Motilal Desarda, a professor and activist, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the State Government's decision to r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Considers Section 11(6) Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator Despite Respondent's Limitation and Notice Validity Objections. Dispute Arises from Water Supply Agreement Dated 25.07.2013 Containing an Arbitration Clause.

The petitioner, a company engaged in supplying desalinized water, entered into a water supply agreement dated 25.07.2013 with the respondent. A disput...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Tamil Nadu's Challenge to Mekedatu Project DPR Preparation — Inter-State River Dispute Requires Cauvery Water Management Authority Consideration. Central Water Commission's Permission for Detailed Project Report Preparation Upheld as No Final Approval Granted.

The Supreme Court of India disposed of Miscellaneous Application No. 3127 of 2018 filed by the State of Tamil Nadu seeking to stay the permission gran...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Mandatory Solar Water Heater Condition for Electricity Connection in Gulbarga. Condition requiring installation of solar water heater for new electricity connections held valid under Section 86(1)(e) of the Electricity Act, 2003 and Regulation 4.02(vi) of KERC Regulations.

The petitioner, Md Hasnuddin, owner of a house in Gulbarga, applied for an electricity connection from the Gulbarga Electricity Supply Company (GESCOM...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Withdrawal of Nomination of Board Member in BWSSB Case — Violation of Natural Justice. Appointment under Section 3(3)(b) of Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Act, 1964 cannot be withdrawn without affording opportunity of hearing.

The petitioner, Sri S.M. Basavaraju, was a Chief Engineer in the Bangalore Water Supply and Drainage Board (BWSSB). He joined the Board on 01.02.1980 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs MIDC to Distinguish Water Usage for Manufacturing vs. Allied Activities in Levy of Water Charges. The court held that MIDC cannot levy uniform higher water charges on industrial units without distinguishing between water used as raw material and water used for allied activities.

The petitioner, United Breweries Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging demand notices, water bills...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Disqualification of Sarpanch Under Section 14(1)(g) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959. Sarpanch Disqualified for Taking Illegal Commercial Water Connection Without Sanction.

The petitioner, Ramdas Dattaraya Khose, was an elected member and Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Padalidariya. Respondents 7 to 9 filed an application und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Water Supply to Industries from Irrigation Dams — No Legal Right to Challenge Government Policy on Water Allocation. Court Held That Petitioners Failed to Establish Any Violation of Fundamental Rights or Statutory Provisions.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed as Public Interest Litigations (PILs) before the Bombay High Court. The first petitioner, Suresh Ram...