High Court of Karnataka Quashes Withdrawal of Nomination of Board Member in BWSSB Case — Violation of Natural Justice. Appointment under Section 3(3)(b) of Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Act, 1964 cannot be withdrawn without affording opportunity of hearing.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 7
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sri S.M. Basavaraju, was a Chief Engineer in the Bangalore Water Supply and Drainage Board (BWSSB). He joined the Board on 01.02.1980 as Assistant Engineer and rose to the rank of Chief Engineer. By a notification dated 28.06.2012 issued under Section 3(3)(b) of the Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Act, 1964, he was nominated as a Member of the Board. However, by a subsequent notification dated 05.11.2013, the respondent, the State of Karnataka, withdrew his nomination without any prior notice or opportunity of hearing. The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of the impugned notification. The Court observed that the impugned notification did not disclose any reason for the withdrawal and was issued without affording the petitioner an opportunity of being heard. The Court held that the withdrawal of nomination without following principles of natural justice was unsustainable. Consequently, the Court allowed the petition and quashed the impugned notification dated 05.11.2013.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Natural Justice - Withdrawal of Nomination - Section 3(3)(b) of Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Act, 1964 - The petitioner was nominated as a Member of the Board under Section 3(3)(b) of the Act. The respondent issued a notification withdrawing the nomination without any notice or opportunity of hearing. The Court held that the withdrawal of nomination without affording an opportunity of hearing is violative of principles of natural justice and quashed the impugned notification. (Paras 1-4)

B) Constitutional Law - Writ Jurisdiction - Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India - The petitioner challenged the notification withdrawing his nomination as a Member of the Board. The Court, exercising its writ jurisdiction, found that the impugned notification was issued without any reason and without hearing the petitioner, and thus set it aside. (Paras 1-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the impugned notification withdrawing the nomination of the petitioner as a Member of the Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board is valid and sustainable in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The impugned notification dated 05.11.2013 (Annexure-A) is quashed.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • Right to be heard
  • Withdrawal of nomination
  • Section 3(3)(b) of Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Act
  • 1964
  • Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (09) 10

Writ Petition No.49857/2013 (GM-RES)

2014-09-18

A.N. Venugopala Gowda

Sandeep S. Patil (for petitioner), T.L. Kiran Kumar (for respondent)

Sri S.M. Basavaraju

The State of Karnataka

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging withdrawal of nomination as Member of Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of impugned notification dated 05.11.2013 withdrawing petitioner's nomination.

Filing Reason

The petitioner's nomination as Member of the Board was withdrawn without any notice or opportunity of hearing.

Issues

Whether the impugned notification withdrawing the nomination of the petitioner as a Member of the Board is valid and sustainable in law.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the withdrawal of nomination was without any reason and without affording an opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice. Respondent's arguments not mentioned in the judgment.

Ratio Decidendi

Withdrawal of nomination without affording an opportunity of hearing is violative of principles of natural justice and cannot be sustained.

Judgment Excerpts

Challenge in this writ petition is to a Notification dated 05.11.2013, as at Annexure-A, withdrawing the nomination of the petitioner as a Member of the Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board. The impugned notification does not disclose any reason for withdrawal of the nomination of the petitioner. The impugned notification is issued without affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Hence, the impugned notification is unsustainable.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the notification dated 05.11.2013. The High Court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 18.09.2014.

Acts & Sections

  • Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Act, 1964: Section 3(3)(b)
  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Re-examination of Complainant in NI Act Case Under Section 311 CrPC. The court held that re-examination to prove a document is permissible for just decision and does not prejudice the accused.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Withdrawal of Nomination of Board Member in BWSSB Case — Violation of Natural Justice. Appointment under Section 3(3)(b) of Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Act, 1964 cannot be withdrawn without affording opportun...