Search Results for "Suo-motu enquiry"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Suo-motu enquiry"

42 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 42 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Land Ceiling Revision Case Due to Inordinate Delay. Suo Motu Revision Initiated After 15 Years Without Calling for Record Held Invalid Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961.

10 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Uttamrao Sampatrao Thakur, a resident of Hivara Bk., Majalgaon, Beed, filed returns under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural L...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Ceiling Proceedings Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Jurisdiction. Additional Commissioner's Suo Moto Revision After 15 Years Held Invalid Under Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961.

10 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Anurat Jadhav, a resident of Salimba, filed a return under Section 12 of the Ceiling Act on 1 December 1975, showing total holding of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Notice Under Section 17(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 for Violation of Natural Justice. Notice Issued Without Opportunity of Hearing to Land Holder Declared Surplus by SLDT.

9 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Tukaram s/o Dajiba Harkal, a resident of Renakhali, Taluka Pathri, District Parbhani, was the original land holder in proceedings unde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Suo Moto Inquiry Notice Under Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 — Notice Issued Without Jurisdiction as Land Was Already Determined Surplus and Acquired. Delay of 18 years in issuing notice under Section 17 renders the inquiry invalid and without jurisdiction.

9 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Raghvendra Yeshwantrao Deshmukh, a resident of Belkund, Taluka Ausa, District Latur, filed a writ petition challenging a notice dated ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Surplus Land Determination Under Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 — Land Tribunal's Order Set Aside for Violation of Principles of Natural Justice and Non-Compliance with Section 12(6) of the Act.

9 Mar 2011

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landholder Babasaheb Balwant Bawane, challenged the order dated 30th April 1993 passed by the Chairman, S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Surplus Land Declaration Under Ceiling Act — Petitioner's Father's Land Holding Incorrectly Calculated Due to Non-Exclusion of Irrigated Land. The court remanded the matter to the Additional Divisional Commissioner for fresh consideration with proper application of the Amended Ceiling Act provisions regarding irrigated land.

9 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Sidhling Rangnath Ghongade, a resident of Ainapurwadi, Taluka Paranda, District Osmanabad, filed a writ petition challenging the judgm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Land Ceiling Case Due to Limitation Bar. Suo Motu Revision Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Initiated Beyond Three-Year Period Is Without Jurisdiction.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Ghanshyam Tukaram Solunke, was an original land holder in proceedings under the Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Ac...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Suo Moto Notice Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land Ceiling Act — Notice Issued After 17 Years Quashed for Being Beyond Limitation Period. The court held that the Additional Commissioner must initiate suo moto enquiry within 3 years from the date of the original order, and failure to do so renders the notice without jurisdiction.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Pandit Dnyanoba Gawali, as legal heir of deceased Dnyanoba Ramkrishnarao Gawali, challenged a notice dated 03.09.1992 issued by the Ad...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Land Ceiling Case Due to Limitation Bar. Additional Commissioner's Suo Moto Notice Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Issued After Eight Years Held Without Jurisdiction.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Tukaram S/o Gopalrao Nakate, a resident of Hadgaon, District Parbhani, filed a return under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Land Ceiling Case Due to Limitation Bar. Suo Moto Enquiry Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Initiated After 17 Years Held Without Jurisdiction.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Madhavrao Laxmanrao Karhale, a resident of Parbhani, filed a return under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on ...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)