Search Results for "Suo Moto Revision"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Suo Moto Revision"

181 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 181 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging MRT Order in Tenancy Revision — Suo Moto Revision Barred by Limitation and Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 76A of Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. The Additional Collector lacked jurisdiction to revise an order of the Sub Divisional Officer beyond one year and under a provision applicable only to Mamlatdar or Tribunal orders.

6 Feb 2015

The petitioner, Rajaram S. Patil, challenged an order dated 22 November 2013 of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (MRT) which had set aside an order da...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Suo Moto Inquiry Notice Under Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 — Notice Issued Without Jurisdiction as Land Was Already Determined Surplus and Acquired. Delay of 18 years in issuing notice under Section 17 renders the inquiry invalid and without jurisdiction.

9 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Raghvendra Yeshwantrao Deshmukh, a resident of Belkund, Taluka Ausa, District Latur, filed a writ petition challenging a notice dated ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Surplus Land Declaration Under Ceiling Act — Petitioner's Father's Land Holding Incorrectly Calculated Due to Non-Exclusion of Irrigated Land. The court remanded the matter to the Additional Divisional Commissioner for fresh consideration with proper application of the Amended Ceiling Act provisions regarding irrigated land.

9 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Sidhling Rangnath Ghongade, a resident of Ainapurwadi, Taluka Paranda, District Osmanabad, filed a writ petition challenging the judgm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Suo Moto Notice Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land Ceiling Act Due to 16-Year Delay. The Court Held That Revisional Power Must Be Exercised Within Reasonable Time, and a Delay of 16 Years Is Unreasonable.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Ansiram Gundiram Gavane, was a landholder in Parbhani, Maharashtra. In 1975, he filed a return under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Suo Moto Notice Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land Ceiling Act — Notice Issued After 17 Years Quashed for Being Beyond Limitation Period. The court held that the Additional Commissioner must initiate suo moto enquiry within 3 years from the date of the original order, and failure to do so renders the notice without jurisdiction.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Pandit Dnyanoba Gawali, as legal heir of deceased Dnyanoba Ramkrishnarao Gawali, challenged a notice dated 03.09.1992 issued by the Ad...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Land Ceiling Case Due to Limitation Bar. Suo Moto Enquiry Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Initiated After 17 Years Held Without Jurisdiction.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Madhavrao Laxmanrao Karhale, a resident of Parbhani, filed a return under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Suo Moto Reopening Notice Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Due to Inordinate Delay. Additional Commissioner's Power to Reopen Enquiry Must Be Exercised Within Reasonable Time, Not Beyond Three Years from Original Order.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Subhadrabai, is the legal heir of Hanumansingh Parihar, who died in 1986. Hanumansingh had filed a return under Section 12 of the Maha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Suo Moto Notice in Ceiling Act Case. Additional Commissioner's Notice Issued After 16 Years Held Without Jurisdiction Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Kondabai, as legal heir of deceased Gangubai Kadam, challenged a notice dated 23.06.1992 issued by the Additional Commissioner, Aurang...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Ceiling Act Case Due to Inordinate Delay in Suo Moto Notice. Additional Commissioner's Power Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Must Be Exercised Within Reasonable Time, Not After 17 Years.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Shantabai Sundarrao Deshmukh, is the legal representative of Sundarrao Rangrao Deshmukh, who died on 31.01.1989. The husband of the pe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Suo Moto Revision Notice Under Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act Due to Inordinate Delay. Notice Issued After 16 Years from Non-Surplus Declaration Held Unreasonable and Without Jurisdiction Under Section 45(2) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioners, legal representatives of deceased Marotrao Khupse, challenged a notice dated 13 July 1992 issued by the Additional Commissioner, Aura...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)