Search Results for "Solapur"

630 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 630 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Reverses Lower Appellate Court's Erroneous Reversal of Trial Court's Decree. The Court Held That the First Appellate Court Must Reappreciate Evidence Independently and That a Co-Owner Cannot Claim Adverse Possession Without Ouster.

The present second appeal arises from a partition suit filed by the original plaintiff (since deceased, represented by legal heirs) against the appell...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Maintenance Claim Under Section 125 CrPC, Restoring Magistrate's Order of Rs. 3000 Per Month. Sessions Court's Reduction Set Aside as Unjustified Given Husband's Income and Assets.

The petitioner, Anita Dashrath Dolare, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, dated 09.04.2018, which ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Collector's Order Dismissing No Confidence Motion Dispute for Lack of Hearing. Petitioner's Application Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 Dismissed Without Affording Opportunity of Hearing, Violating Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Sunil Bhaskar Katkar, was elected as Sarpanch of Belati Grampanchayat in June 2015. On 3rd March 2018, respondent nos.1 to 6 filed an ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Water Supply to Industries from Irrigation Dams — No Legal Right to Challenge Government Policy on Water Allocation. Court Held That Petitioners Failed to Establish Any Violation of Fundamental Rights or Statutory Provisions.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed as Public Interest Litigations (PILs) before the Bombay High Court. The first petitioner, Suresh Ram...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Petition in Bombay Tenancy Act Case — Certificate of Purchase Under Section 32M Cannot Be Challenged After 9 Years. The Court Held That the Certificate Is Conclusive and the Landlord Cannot Seek Termination of Tenancy After the Tenant Has Purchased the Land.

The case involves a dispute under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948 regarding agricultural land bearing Gat No. 98 in village Tilleha...