Search Results for "Slum Rehabilitation Project"

115 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 115 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Apex Grievance Redressal Committee Order in Slum Rehabilitation Case. AGRC's Reversal of Developer Termination Set Aside for Non-Application of Mind and Violation of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Hanuman Nagar (Jogeshwari) SRA CHS (Proposed), is a society of slum dwellers residing on a plot in Jogeshwari, Mumbai. In 2006, the ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Slum Rehabilitation Authority's Cancellation of Letter of Intent for Non-Compliance. SRA's Power to Revoke LoI for Failure to Obtain 70% Consent and Complete Rehabilitation Upheld.

The petitioners, M/s. Platinum Realty and M/s. Jaihind SRA Cooperative Society (Proposed), filed a writ petition challenging the decision of the Slum ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance of Slum Development Agreement Due to Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 42 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act. Civil Court Cannot Entertain Disputes Relating to Slum Rehabilitation Schemes as Exclusive Jurisdiction Vests with Slum Authorities.

The plaintiff, Lokhandwala Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for specific performance of a development agreement dated 10 August 2003, entered in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Declaration of Title and Possession in Property Dispute Between Brothers. Consent Decree and Subsequent Transfers Bar Reopening of Title Under Section 9A CPC.

The plaintiff, Naresh Lachmandas Aswani, filed a suit against his brother Haridas (defendant no.1) and two companies (defendant nos.2 and 3) seeking a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to SRA Order in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. CEO's Direction to Process Letter of Intent Upheld as 70% Consent of Eligible Members Was Validly Obtained Under DCR 33(10).

The case involves a slum rehabilitation scheme under DCR 33(10) of the Development Control Regulations for Greater Mumbai. The petitioners, Lokhandwal...