Bombay High Court Quashes State Government's Cancellation of Slum Rehabilitation Project Approval — Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Hearing. Government's order cancelling Letter of Intent and earlier approvals under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act set aside as petitioner was not given opportunity of hearing before cancellation.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 121
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Lashkaria Construction Pvt. Ltd. and its director, challenged an order dated 24 April 2012 passed by the State Government of Maharashtra. The impugned order cancelled a Circular dated 12 November 2010 issued by the Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA), a State Government letter dated 5 October 2010 (a direction under Section 3K(i) of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Development) Act, 1971), and a Letter of Intent (LOI) dated 23 November 2010 issued by the CEO of SRA in favour of the petitioner. The petitioner had submitted a proposal for cluster development/special township development under Section 3K of the Slum Act on 6 February 2010. The State Government approved the proposal on 5 October 2010 and issued directions to SRA under Section 3K. Subsequently, on 16 October 2010, SRA sought clarification from the Government regarding whether consent of 70% of slum dwellers should be obtained sectorwise. The Government responded on 11 November 2010. Thereafter, on 12 November 2010, SRA issued a Circular regarding the project. On 23 November 2010, SRA issued a Letter of Intent to the petitioner. However, on 24 April 2012, the State Government passed the impugned order cancelling all these approvals. The petitioner contended that the impugned order was passed without giving them any opportunity of hearing, in violation of principles of natural justice. The respondents argued that the cancellation was based on policy considerations and that no hearing was required. The court held that the impugned order adversely affected the petitioner's rights and was passed without affording any opportunity of hearing, thus violating natural justice. The court set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter to the State Government to decide afresh after giving the petitioner a reasonable opportunity of hearing. The court also directed that the petitioner be heard within eight weeks from the date of the judgment.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Natural Justice - Cancellation of Approvals - Right to be Heard - The State Government cancelled a Letter of Intent and earlier approvals for a slum rehabilitation project without giving the petitioner an opportunity of hearing - Held that the impugned order is in violation of principles of natural justice and is set aside - The matter is remitted to the State Government to decide afresh after hearing the petitioner (Paras 1-17).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the State Government's order dated 24 April 2012 cancelling the earlier approvals and Letter of Intent issued in favour of the petitioner for a cluster development project under the Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971 is valid, particularly when the petitioner was not afforded an opportunity of hearing before the cancellation.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The impugned order dated 24 April 2012 is quashed and set aside. The matter is remitted to the State Government to decide afresh after giving the petitioner a reasonable opportunity of hearing. The State Government shall hear the petitioner within eight weeks from the date of the judgment.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • Right to be heard
  • Cancellation of administrative orders
  • Section 3K Maharashtra Slum Areas Act
  • 1971
  • Article 226 Constitution of India
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (03) 76

Writ Petition No.741 of 2013

2015-03-12

Mohit S. Shah, C.J., M.S. Sanklecha, J.

Mr. Arif Bookwala, Sr. Advocate with Mr. S. G. Surana for the Petitioner; Mr. D. J. Khambatta, Advocate General with Mr. Milind More, Addl. G.P., for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2; Mr. V. D. Patil, for Respondent No.3

Lashkaria Construction Pvt. Ltd. and Mr. Mohd. Hasam Yasin Lashkaria

State of Maharashtra, The Principal Secretary, Housing Department, Gov. of Maharashtra, and Slum Rehabilitation Authority

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the State Government's order cancelling approvals and Letter of Intent for a slum rehabilitation project.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the impugned order dated 24 April 2012 and restoration of the earlier approvals and Letter of Intent.

Filing Reason

The State Government cancelled the petitioner's project approvals without giving an opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice.

Previous Decisions

The State Government had issued a direction under Section 3K(i) on 5 October 2010 approving the proposal, and SRA issued a Letter of Intent on 23 November 2010. These were cancelled by the impugned order dated 24 April 2012.

Issues

Whether the impugned order cancelling the approvals and Letter of Intent was passed in violation of principles of natural justice. Whether the petitioner was entitled to a hearing before the cancellation of the approvals.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the impugned order was passed without any opportunity of hearing, violating natural justice. Respondents contended that the cancellation was based on policy and no hearing was required.

Ratio Decidendi

An order cancelling approvals and a Letter of Intent that confer rights on a party cannot be passed without affording that party an opportunity of hearing, as it violates principles of natural justice.

Judgment Excerpts

This Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenges the order dated 24 April 2012 of the State Government. The impugned order cancels the Circular dated 12 November 2010... and Letter of Intent (LOI) dated 23 November 2010... issued in favour of the Petitioner. The impugned order is in violation of principles of natural justice and is set aside.

Procedural History

The petitioner submitted a proposal on 6 February 2010. The State Government approved it on 5 October 2010. SRA issued a Circular on 12 November 2010 and a Letter of Intent on 23 November 2010. The State Government passed the impugned cancellation order on 24 April 2012. The petitioner filed this writ petition on 4 February 2013. The High Court reserved judgment on 9 January 2015 and pronounced on 12 March 2015.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Development) Act, 1971: Section 3K, Section 3K(i)
  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes State Government's Cancellation of Slum Rehabilitation Project Approval — Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Hearing. Government's order cancelling Letter of Intent and earlier approvals under Maharashtra Slum Areas ...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Civil Revision Application in Tenancy Dispute — Order VII Rule 11 CPC Application Properly Dismissed. Plaint Not Barred by Law as Tenancy Claim Requires Proof, Not Mere Allegation.