Search Results for "Section 35G"

45 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 45 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Service Tax Classification Dispute. Services Provided by Respondent to Overseas Manufacturers Held Not Classifiable as Business Auxiliary Services and Treated as Export of Services.

The Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai, appealed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against an order dated 07-01-2015 passed by the Cu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Orders on Limitation Act Applicability to RDDBFI Act Appeals. Court Holds Section 5 of Limitation Act Applies to Appeals Under Section 30 of RDDBFI Act, Rejecting Petitioners' Argument That Special Statute Excludes Limitation Act.

The petitioners, owners of apartments in Jupiter Complex, Nagpur, challenged orders of the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) and Debts Recovery Appellate ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Refund Case. Principles of Unjust Enrichment Under Section 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944 Not Applicable to Refund Arising on Finalisation of Provisional Assessment.

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai II appealed against the order of the appellate authorities below which allowed the refund claim of M/s. Sta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals as Not Maintainable in Service Tax Refund Case. The issue of refund under notifications granting exemption for services consumed in SEZ relates to rate of duty, thus appeal lies to Supreme Court under Section 35G(1) of Central Excise Act, 1944.

The case involves a batch of appeals filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Pune (Revenue) against an order dated 28th March 2013 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Classification Dispute — Interest Not Payable Without Specific Provision. Held that Section 11AA of Central Excise Act, 1944 does not apply to Additional Duties under ADE (T&TA) Act, 1978, and interest cannot be levied in absence of charging provision.

The appellant, Indo Swiss Embroidery Industries Limited, is engaged in manufacturing embroidered grey fabrics classified under Chapter Sub Heading 580...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Service Tax Classification Dispute. Construction of Shiv Chatrapati Sports Complex Held Not 'Commercial or Industrial Construction' Under Section 65(25b) of Finance Act, 1994.

The Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Pune-III filed an appeal under Section 35G(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case on CENVAT Credit Restriction for Inputs from 100% EOU. Rule 3(6)(a)(i) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002 restricts credit on inputs manufactured by a 100% EOU, and reversal under Rule 3(4) does not remove the restriction.

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Raigad filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order of the Customs, Excise ...