Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Classification Dispute — Interest Not Payable Without Specific Provision. Held that Section 11AA of Central Excise Act, 1944 does not apply to Additional Duties under ADE (T&TA) Act, 1978, and interest cannot be levied in absence of charging provision.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Indo Swiss Embroidery Industries Limited, is engaged in manufacturing embroidered grey fabrics classified under Chapter Sub Heading 5804.11 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The Central Excise Department alleged incorrect classification and that the appellant was liable to pay Additional Duty of Excise (Textile & Textile Articles) at 15% instead of 8% from 20/08/1998. A show cause notice was issued, and the adjudicating authority confirmed the demand along with interest under Section 11AA of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the demand but set aside the interest. The Revenue appealed to the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), which restored the interest. The appellant filed this appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act. The legal issue was whether interest could be levied under the Additional Duties of Excise (Textile & Textile Articles) Act, 1978, which does not contain any provision for interest. The appellant argued that Section 11AA of the Central Excise Act is not applicable to the ADE (T&TA) Act, as the latter is a separate enactment with its own machinery provisions. The respondent contended that Section 3(3) of the ADE (T&TA) Act incorporates the provisions of the Central Excise Act, including interest provisions. The Court analyzed Section 3(3) and found that it only incorporates provisions relating to levy and collection of additional duties, not all provisions of the Central Excise Act. Since the ADE (T&TA) Act does not have a specific provision for interest, no interest can be charged. The Court also noted that the Tribunal erred in holding that the appellant had not agitated the interest issue earlier, as it was a pure question of law. The appeal was allowed, and the order of the Tribunal regarding interest was set aside.

Headnote

A) Central Excise - Interest Liability - Absence of Charging Provision - Section 11AA of Central Excise Act, 1944 and Section 3(3) of Additional Duties of Excise (Textile & Textile Articles) Act, 1978 - The issue was whether interest can be levied on additional duty under the ADE (T&TA) Act when that Act does not contain any provision for interest. The Court held that Section 11AA of the Central Excise Act is not applicable to the ADE (T&TA) Act as the latter is a separate enactment with its own machinery provisions. Since the ADE (T&TA) Act does not provide for interest, no interest can be charged. The Tribunal's order confirming interest was set aside. (Paras 1-10)

B) Central Excise - Appellate Tribunal - Scope of Appeal - Question of Law - Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944 - The Court considered whether the Tribunal erred in holding that the appellant had not agitated the interest issue earlier. The Court found that the issue of interest was a pure question of law and could be raised for the first time in appeal. The Tribunal's observation that the issue was not agitated was incorrect. (Paras 2-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Appellate Tribunal was correct in holding that the appellant is liable to pay interest when there is no provision in law for charging interest under the Additional Duties of Excise (Textile & Textile Articles) Act, 1978.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. The order of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad dated 27.09.2013, insofar as it relates to interest, is set aside. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Interest cannot be levied without specific statutory provision
  • Section 11AA of Central Excise Act not applicable to ADE (T&TA) Act
  • 1978
  • Classification dispute under Central Excise Tariff Act
  • 1985
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (07) 97

Central Excise Appeal No. 111 of 2015

2017-07-17

Anoop V. Mohta, Smt. Anuja Prabhudessai

Mr. Bharat Raichandani i/by Mr. Gaurav Agrawal for the Appellant, Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly for the Respondent

Indo Swiss Embroidery Industries Limited

Commissioner of Central Excise, Vapi

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against order of CESTAT confirming interest on additional duty of excise.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to quash and set aside the Tribunal's order confirming interest liability.

Filing Reason

The appellant challenged the imposition of interest under Section 11AA of the Central Excise Act on additional duty levied under the ADE (T&TA) Act, 1978, which has no provision for interest.

Previous Decisions

The adjudicating authority confirmed demand with interest; Commissioner (Appeals) set aside interest; CESTAT restored interest.

Issues

Whether interest can be levied under the Additional Duties of Excise (Textile & Textile Articles) Act, 1978 in the absence of a specific provision for interest. Whether the Tribunal erred in holding that the appellant had not agitated the interest issue earlier.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that Section 11AA of the Central Excise Act is not applicable to the ADE (T&TA) Act as it is a separate enactment with its own machinery provisions, and no interest can be charged without a charging provision. Respondent argued that Section 3(3) of the ADE (T&TA) Act incorporates the provisions of the Central Excise Act, including interest provisions.

Ratio Decidendi

Interest cannot be levied under the Additional Duties of Excise (Textile & Textile Articles) Act, 1978 because that Act does not contain any provision for interest. Section 3(3) of the ADE (T&TA) Act only incorporates provisions relating to levy and collection of additional duties, not all provisions of the Central Excise Act. Therefore, Section 11AA of the Central Excise Act is not applicable, and no interest can be charged.

Judgment Excerpts

The provision of law which is applicable is: Subsection (3) of Section 3 of the Additional Duties of Excise (Textile & Textile Articles) Act, 1978 (ADE (T&TA) Act) and the same reads as under: ... The Tribunal has erred in holding that the appellant is liable to pay interest when there is no provision in law for charging interest.

Procedural History

Show cause notice issued by Central Excise Department alleging incorrect classification; adjudicating authority confirmed demand with interest; Commissioner (Appeals) set aside interest; Revenue appealed to CESTAT which restored interest; appellant filed appeal under Section 35G of Central Excise Act before Bombay High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Central Excise Act, 1944: Section 11AA, Section 35G
  • Additional Duties of Excise (Textile & Textile Articles) Act, 1978: Section 3(3)
  • Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985: Chapter Sub Heading 5804.11, 5804.19
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Classification Dispute — Interest Not Payable Without Specific Provision. Held that Section 11AA of Central Excise Act, 1944 does not apply to Additional Duties under ADE (T&TA) Act, 1978, and inter...
Related Judgement
High Court "Applicant Acquitted in Bus Accident Case: Conviction Overturned Due to Lack of Evidence on Rash and Negligent Driving" Court Cites Insufficient Proof of Rashness or Negligence, Discusses Contributory Negligence of the Deceased.