Search Results for "Section 220"

538 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 538 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Land Acquisition Appeals for Lack of Evidence and Limitation — Compensation Enhancement Denied Due to Failure to Prove Market Value and Delay in Filing Appeals.

The judgment pertains to a batch of appeals filed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, against the judgment and award dated 06.04.2010 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Provisional Attachment and Stay Rejection in Income Tax Case — Violation of Natural Justice and CBDT Circular. Petitioner's Bank Accounts Attached Without Prior Hearing; Court Directs Restoration of Status Quo Pending Appeal.

The petitioner, Milestone Real Estate Fund, a real estate fund, challenged the provisional attachment of its assets under Section 281B of the Income T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows in Part Appeals by Claimants and State in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute. Market Value of Agricultural Land Determined at Rs. 1,00,000 per Hectare Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, with Interest on Enhanced Compensation.

The case involves four appeals arising from land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The State of Maharashtra acquired agric...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Interest Under Section 220(2) Held Leviable Till Final Order of Settlement Commission Under Section 245D(4). The Court set aside the Tribunal's order restricting interest till the date of admission of application under Section 245D(1).

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which held that interest u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in CBI Bribery Case Due to Lack of Independent Witnesses and Procedural Lapses. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Rajesh Mopkar, a clerk in the Income Tax Office, Nagpur, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur, for demanding and accepting a brib...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Reference, Enhances Compensation for Acquired Land Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court Determined Market Value Based on Comparable Sale Instances and Potential for Development, Rejecting Government's Valuation Method.

The case is a land acquisition reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, arising from the acquisition of land belonging to Godrej ...