Search Results for "Section 18(1) second proviso"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Section 18(1) second proviso"

53 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 53 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against HERC Amendment Denying Tariff Adjustment to Biomass Power Plant Commissioned in FY 2013-14. The Court held that classification of projects based on financial year of commissioning within the same control period was arbitrary and discriminatory under the HERC Regulations.

2 Jul 2019

The case involves an appeal by M/S Star Wire (India) Vidyut Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. against the Haryana Electricity Regulatory Commission (HERC) regarding th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Transfer Petition in Cheque Dishonour Case, Upholds Jurisdiction Under Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

6 Mar 2025

Bank’s Right to Choose Jurisdiction for Cheque Dishonour Cases Upheld – Transfer Denied Under Section 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Municipal Corporation's Appeal in Enemy Property Tax Exemption Case — Property Tax Levyable on Lessee Despite Union Ownership. Article 285(2) of Constitution Enables Municipal Corporation to Impose Property Tax on Lessee of Union Property Even if Union Itself is Exempt Under Article 285(1).

22 Feb 2024

The present civil appeal arises from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court which allowed a writ petition filed by the respondent-assessee, holding th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers Review Petitions on Women's Entry to Sabarimala Temple to Larger Bench — Constitutional Questions on Religious Freedom and Essential Practices Require Authoritative Determination by Seven-Judge Bench. The court identified an apparent conflict between Shirur Mutt and Durgah Committee regarding judicial review of essential religious practices under Articles 25 and 26 of the Constitution.

14 Nov 2019

The Supreme Court, in a judgment dated November 14, 2019, disposed of a batch of review petitions and connected matters arising from the earlier judgm...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Ruling That Time Limit Under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act is Directory. The provision requiring District Magistrate to pass possession order within 30 days (extendable to 60 days) is directory, as non-compliance does not invalidate proceedings or prejudice the borrower.

1 Jan 2020

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Kerala High Court which held that the time limit under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Hindu Religious Endowments Case — Commissioner Not a Court, Section 5 Limitation Act Not Applicable. Delay Condonation by Commissioner Under Section 69 of Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 Set Aside as Commissioner Lacks Power to Apply Section 5 of Limitation Act.

3 May 2019

The appeal arose from a dispute concerning the right to receive first respect as an Ambalam in a village in Tamil Nadu. The appellant, Ganesan, throug...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Holding That Bail in Original FIR Does Not Cover Newly Added UAPA Offences and NIA Re-Registration Is Not a Second FIR. The court ruled that the appellant must seek fresh bail for offences under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, and that the NIA's re-registration and further investigation were lawful.

26 Apr 2019

The appellant, Pradeep Ram, was initially arrested in connection with FIR No. 02/2016 registered at Police Station Tandwa for offences under Sections ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Quashing of FIR in Bank Fraud Case — High Court Erred in Holding That Section 81(5B) of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 Bars Registration of FIR by Third Party Based on Audit Report. The Court held that the special procedure under Section 81(5B) does not override the general criminal procedure for third-party complaints, and the FIR based on an audit report disclosing cognizable offences must be investigated.

20 Jul 2023

The appeal arises from a judgment of the Bombay High Court quashing FIR No. 806 of 2019 lodged by the appellant, Dhanraj N Asawani, against the respon...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Activates Dormant Constitutional Provision for Appointment of Ad Hoc Judges to Address High Court Backlog. The Court held that Article 224A of the Constitution of India can be utilized to appoint retired High Court judges as ad hoc judges to tackle over 57 lakh pending cases and 40% vacancies, emphasizing dynamic interpretation and consent requirements.

20 Apr 2021

The Supreme Court of India, in a public interest litigation filed by Lok Prahari, addressed the critical issue of backlog in High Courts, with over 57...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Transfer Petitions in Criminal Cases Alleging Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction — Cause of Action Not Wholly Absent in Gurugram

30 Sep 2020

The petitioner, Kaushik Chatterjee, was appointed as Group Chief Risk Officer-Executive Director of a non-banking finance company (the second responde...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)