Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Matter — Assessment of Compensation and Allied Issues. Dispute Involves Quantum of Compensation and Locus Standi of Acquiring Body Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
1 Jan 2026...
Search Results for "Section 120(2)"
87 result(s) found
Found 87 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Examines Whether Land Acquisition Act Permits Acquisition of Building Part Without Underlying Land; State's Appeal Against High Court Quashing of Acquisition Without Land Under Consideration
31 Jul 2026The State of Maharashtra appealed against a common judgment of the High Court which quashed land acquisition proceedings initiated under the Land Acqu...
- 77
High Court
Madras High Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator and Grants Interim Relief in Financial Dispute. Court Allows Appointment of Receiver to Secure Hypothecated Assets Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
9 Feb 2026The petitioner, Vivriti Capital Limited, filed three applications before the Madras High Court: Arb.O.P.No.720 of 2025 under Section 11(6)(a) of the A...
- 52
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against DIC and Sales Tax Department for Refusing Transfer of Property Purchased in SARFAESI Auction — Auction Purchaser Not Liable for Previous Owner's Sales Tax Dues. The court held that the auction purchaser under the SARFAESI Act acquires clear title free from prior encumbrances, and the DIC cannot insist on NOC from Sales Tax for transfer of property.
18 Feb 2021The petitioner, Medineutrina Pvt. Ltd., purchased an immovable property (plot no.206, MIDC, Butibori, Nagpur) in an auction conducted by Punjab Nation...
- 26
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Reinstating Daily Wager Employees with Continuity of Service. The court upheld the finding that termination of employees who had worked for more than 240 days without following Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 constituted an unfair labour practice under the MRTU & PULP Act.
28 Feb 2025The State of Maharashtra, through the Secretary of Medical Education and Drugs Department, the Director of Medical Education and Research, and the Dea...
- 440
High Court
Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Gram Panchayat President — Motion Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. The court held that the mandatory 15-day notice period was not complied with, rendering the no-confidence motion and resolution invalid.
12 Dec 2018The petitioner, Sri Harisha I.E., was the President of Ichanahally Gram Panchayat. A no-confidence motion was moved against him by the respondents, wh...
- 95
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes No Confidence Motion Against Gram Panchayat Chairman for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Notice Period Under Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. The court held that the 15-day notice period is mandatory and failure to comply renders the motion invalid.
12 Jul 2019The petitioner, Smt. S. Palakshamma, was the Chairman of Marashettihalli Gram Panchayat. The respondents, including the Assistant Commissioner and sev...
- 146
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Compromise Decree in Property Suit Despite Third-Party Intervention Claim — Consent Terms Binding on Parties, Intervener's Rights Not Affected. The Court held that a compromise between the original parties does not affect the rights of a third party claiming independent title, and such third party need not be impleaded in the suit.
29 Nov 2024The judgment arises from a suit filed by Vinesh Rashmikant Shah and others (Plaintiffs) against Pee Jay Traders and others (Defendants) concerning dis...
- 395
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Upheld. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC where lower appellate court's finding that property is joint family property is based on evidence.
8 Jul 2024The case involves a Regular Second Appeal filed by the defendants (appellants) against the judgment and decree of the Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.), Ranebennu...
- 141
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Detenu's wife successfully challenged detention order as grounds of detention did not reflect consideration of retraction of confessional statement and bail order, rendering detention invalid.
24 Aug 2012The petitioner, Sangita Deepak Jare, wife of the detenu Deepak Sharad Jare, filed a writ of habeas corpus challenging the preventive detention order d...
- 160
