Search Results for "Sarla Verma multiplier"

850 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 850 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Multiplier Corrected to 18 for Deceased Aged 28 Years. Loss of dependency recalculated using multiplier 18 as per Sarla Verma v. DTC, (2009) 6 SCC 121, resulting in enhanced compensation of Rs.6,06,000.

The appeal arises from a motor vehicle accident claim. The deceased, Rahamathulla, aged 28 years, died in a motor vehicle accident on 13.10.2000. He w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Part Reducing Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Wrong Multiplier. Multiplier of 13 applied instead of 20 based on age of claimants, reducing award from Rs.2,73,000 to Rs.1,74,000.

The appeal was filed by the National Insurance Co. Ltd. and the owner of the truck against the judgment and award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribuna...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal for Enhancement of Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Non-Application of Multiplier. Multiplier of 17 applied to 20% permanent disability with notional income of Rs. 4,500 per month for loss of earning capacity.

The appellant, Ramesh Manoharrao Bote, filed a claim petition before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bhoom, seeking compensation for injuries sust...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Appeal by BMTC in Motor Accident Claim, Reduces Compensation Due to Multiplier Error. Tribunal's Use of Multiplier '18' for Deceased Aged 30 Years Held Incorrect; Proper Multiplier is '17' Under Sarla Verma Guidelines.

The appellant, Managing Director of Motor Claims Hub, BMTC, challenged the judgment and award dated 01.01.2022 passed by the XIV Additional Small Caus...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Enhancement of Compensation in Motor Accident Claim for Watch Maker's Death — Multiplier Corrected to 16 and Future Prospects Added. Claimants awarded Rs.10,78,000 with interest at 7.5% per annum under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The present appeal was filed by the original claimants, the legal heirs of Gunwant Narayan Bari, seeking enhancement of compensation awarded by the Mo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim. Multiplier Under Section 163A Motor Vehicles Act Must Be Based on Age of Deceased, Not Dependents.

The case involves an appeal by Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. against an award of compensation under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Enhances Compensation for Paraplegic Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Multiplier Applied as per Sarla Verma, Future Prospects Granted, and Interest Rate Increased to 9%

The appeal was filed by the original claimant, Dhanrajbhai Khumabhai Rabari (since deceased, represented by legal heirs), against the judgment and awa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Enhances Compensation by Applying Correct Multiplier and Future Prospects. Contributory Negligence Finding Set Aside as No Evidence of Negligence by Deceased Driver.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the legal heirs of Hamirji Virchandbhai Thakor, who died in a vehicular accident on 2nd September...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Insurance Company's Appeal Reducing Compensation in Motor Accident Claim. Multiplier reduced from 14 to 11 for deceased aged 55 under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appeal was filed by the insurance company against the award of Rs.10,30,556/- with 7.5% interest by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in favour o...