Bombay High Court Partly Allows Insurance Company's Appeal Reducing Compensation in Motor Accident Claim. Multiplier reduced from 14 to 11 for deceased aged 55 under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 100
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by the insurance company against the award of Rs.10,30,556/- with 7.5% interest by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in favour of the widow and two children of the deceased who died in a truck accident. The deceased was aged 55 years. The appellant argued that the multiplier of 14 was excessive and that the claimants, including a major son aged 22 and a daughter aged 18, were not fully dependent. The court agreed, holding that as per Sarla Verma v. DTC, the appropriate multiplier for age 55 is 11. The court also noted that the son was major and the daughter was of marriageable age, reducing dependency. The court recalculated compensation: monthly income Rs.6,000, annual Rs.72,000, less 1/3rd personal expenses = Rs.48,000, multiplied by 11 = Rs.5,28,000, plus Rs.5,000 funeral expenses, Rs.5,000 loss of consortium, Rs.2,500 loss of estate, total Rs.5,40,500. The award was reduced to Rs.5,40,500 with 7.5% interest. The appeal was partly allowed.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Multiplier Determination - Deceased aged 55 years - Tribunal applied multiplier of 14 which was excessive - Held that multiplier should be 11 as per Sarla Verma v. DTC (2009) 6 SCC 121 - Compensation reduced accordingly (Paras 3-5).

B) Motor Accident Claims - Dependency Calculation - Claimants included major son aged 22 and daughter aged 18 - Held that dependency of major son and marriageable daughter is limited - Deduction of 1/3rd for personal expenses of deceased applied (Paras 3-5).

C) Motor Accident Claims - Contributory Negligence - No evidence of contributory negligence by deceased - Tribunal's finding of sole negligence on truck driver upheld (Para 4).

D) Motor Accident Claims - Interest Rate - 7.5% per annum from date of petition till realization - Held to be reasonable (Para 5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal was excessive and exorbitant, particularly regarding the multiplier applied and the dependency calculation.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal partly allowed. Compensation reduced from Rs.10,30,556/- to Rs.5,40,500/- with interest at 7.5% per annum from date of petition till realization. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Motor Accident Claims
  • Multiplier Determination
  • Dependency Calculation
  • Contributory Negligence
  • Interest Rate
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (BOM) (12) 148

First Appeal No.426 of 2013

2013-12-09

A. P. Bhangale, J.

Shri D.N.Kukday for appellant, Shri V.A.Kothale for R-1 to 3, Shri R.S.Kurekar for R-4 & 5

The Manager, Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co.Ltd., Pune

Suchita wd/o Vijay Choudhari & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against award of compensation in motor accident claim

Remedy Sought

Reduction of compensation amount awarded by Tribunal

Filing Reason

Insurance company contended that compensation was excessive and multiplier was wrongly applied

Previous Decisions

Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.10,30,556/- with 7.5% interest

Issues

Whether the multiplier of 14 applied by the Tribunal was excessive? Whether the dependency calculation was correct considering the age and status of claimants?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that multiplier 14 was excessive for deceased aged 55; proper multiplier is 11. Appellant argued that major son aged 22 and daughter aged 18 were not fully dependent. Respondents supported the Tribunal's award.

Ratio Decidendi

For a deceased aged 55 years, the appropriate multiplier is 11 as per Sarla Verma v. DTC. Dependency of major children and marriageable daughter is limited. Deduction of 1/3rd for personal expenses is proper.

Judgment Excerpts

the learned Member of the Tribunal could not have awarded the compensation by applying excessive multiplier '14'. the appropriate multiplier in the case of the deceased aged 55 years would be 11.

Procedural History

Claim petition MACP No.140/2009 was allowed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Amravati on 23.9.2011 awarding Rs.10,30,556/-. Insurance company filed First Appeal No.426/2013 before Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 166
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Partly Allows Insurance Company's Appeal Reducing Compensation in Motor Accident Claim. Multiplier reduced from 14 to 11 for deceased aged 55 under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Ex-Trustee's Deletion from Revision Proceedings in Trust Dispute. Joint Charity Commissioner's Order Set Aside for Violating Natural Justice and Misapplying the Test of Necessary Party Under Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1951...