Bombay High Court Allows Enhancement of Compensation in Motor Accident Claim for Watch Maker's Death — Multiplier Corrected to 16 and Future Prospects Added. Claimants awarded Rs.10,78,000 with interest at 7.5% per annum under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 66
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The present appeal was filed by the original claimants, the legal heirs of Gunwant Narayan Bari, seeking enhancement of compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jalgaon, in M.A.C.P. No.292/2007 dated 17.12.2013. The claimants, consisting of the widow and three minor daughters, along with the parents of the deceased, had filed a petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, claiming that the deceased was a pillion rider on a motorcycle on 04.02.2007 when a truck coming from the opposite direction dashed against them, causing fatal injuries. The deceased was a watch maker assisting his father in Avdhut Watch Company, earning Rs.5,000 per month, and was aged 39 years. The Tribunal awarded total compensation of Rs.5,44,000 with interest at 7.5% per annum. The claimants appealed contending that the multiplier applied was wrong and future prospects were not considered. The High Court, relying on Sarla Verma v. DTC and Pranay Sethi, held that the correct multiplier for age 39 is 16, and 40% future prospects should be added. The court recalculated the compensation: notional income Rs.5,000 per month, plus 40% future prospects = Rs.7,000, deducting 1/4th for personal expenses = Rs.5,250 per month, annual = Rs.63,000, multiplied by 16 = Rs.10,08,000. Adding Rs.70,000 under conventional heads (loss of consortium, loss of estate, funeral expenses) as per Pranay Sethi, total compensation comes to Rs.10,78,000. The court enhanced the compensation by Rs.5,34,000 over the Tribunal's award, with interest at 7.5% per annum from the date of petition till realization. The appeal was partly allowed.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Compensation - Multiplier - Future Prospects - The Tribunal applied multiplier of 15 for deceased aged 39 years, but as per Sarla Verma v. DTC, (2009) 6 SCC 121, the correct multiplier is 16. Also, 40% future prospects should be added as per National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi, (2017) 16 SCC 680. Held that the compensation is enhanced accordingly (Paras 7-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal was just and proper, and whether the claimants are entitled to enhancement.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal partly allowed. Compensation enhanced from Rs.5,44,000 to Rs.10,78,000. The enhanced amount of Rs.5,34,000 shall carry interest at 7.5% per annum from the date of petition till realization. Respondent No.2 (Insurance Company) directed to deposit the enhanced amount within eight weeks.

Law Points

  • Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
  • Section 166
  • Compensation
  • Multiplier
  • Future Prospects
  • Sarla Verma v. DTC
  • Pranay Sethi
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (08) 2

First Appeal No.393 of 2017

2019-08-01

Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi, J.

Mr. M.M. Bhokarikar for appellants, Mr. R.L. Adhe for respondent No.1 (absent), Mr. A.S. Usmanpurkar for respondent No.2

Smt. Usha Gunvant Bari (Kolhe) and others

Abdul Amir Sk. Lallu Khan and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal for enhancement of compensation in a motor accident claim

Remedy Sought

Claimants sought enhancement of compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal

Filing Reason

Claimants were dissatisfied with the compensation awarded by the Tribunal and sought higher compensation

Previous Decisions

Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jalgaon, awarded Rs.5,44,000 with interest at 7.5% per annum in M.A.C.P. No.292/2007 dated 17.12.2013

Issues

Whether the multiplier of 15 applied by the Tribunal is correct? Whether future prospects should be added to the income of the deceased?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the Tribunal erred in applying multiplier of 15 instead of 16 as per Sarla Verma v. DTC, and failed to add future prospects as per Pranay Sethi. Respondent No.2 (Insurance Company) opposed the appeal, supporting the Tribunal's award.

Ratio Decidendi

For a deceased aged 39 years, the correct multiplier is 16 as per Sarla Verma v. DTC, and 40% future prospects must be added as per Pranay Sethi. The compensation is to be calculated accordingly.

Judgment Excerpts

The multiplier applied by the Tribunal is 15, but as per the decision in Sarla Verma v. DTC, (2009) 6 SCC 121, the multiplier for the age group of 36 to 40 years is 16. As per the decision in National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi, (2017) 16 SCC 680, 40% future prospects are to be added.

Procedural History

The claimants filed M.A.C.P. No.292/2007 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jalgaon, which awarded compensation on 17.12.2013. Aggrieved, the claimants filed the present First Appeal No.393 of 2017 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 166
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Enhancement of Compensation in Motor Accident Claim for Watch Maker's Death — Multiplier Corrected to 16 and Future Prospects Added. Claimants awarded Rs.10,78,000 with interest at 7.5% per annum under Section 166 of Motor ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Setting Aside of Sarpanch Election Due to Procedural Violation. Election by show of hands after demand for secret ballot under Rule 10 of Bombay Village Panchayats (Sarpanch and Upsarpanch) Election Ru...