Search Results for "SLDT"

22 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 22 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging MRT Order Setting Aside SDO's Possession Order Under Section 120(c) of MTAL Act — MRT Exceeded Jurisdiction by Entertaining Revision Beyond Limitation and Allowing Amendment Without Notice.

The petitioner, a Public Trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, owned agricultural land survey 209 admeasuring 35 acres at mouza Umarkhed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Ceiling Proceedings Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Jurisdiction. Additional Commissioner's Suo Moto Revision After 15 Years Held Invalid Under Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Anurat Jadhav, a resident of Salimba, filed a return under Section 12 of the Ceiling Act on 1 December 1975, showing total holding of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Writ Petition Against Surplus Land Determination Tribunal Order for Lack of Alternative Remedy Exhaustion. Court holds that direct writ petition is not maintainable when statutory remedies under Section 45(2) of the Ceiling Act are available.

The State of Maharashtra filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the j...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Notice Under Section 17(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 for Violation of Natural Justice. Notice Issued Without Opportunity of Hearing to Land Holder Declared Surplus by SLDT.

The petitioner, Tukaram s/o Dajiba Harkal, a resident of Renakhali, Taluka Pathri, District Parbhani, was the original land holder in proceedings unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Surplus Land Determination Under Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling Holdings) Act — Petitioner Failed to Show Error in Tribunal's Finding That He Was a Non-Surplus Holder.

The petitioner, Keshavrao s/o Vaijoba Deshmukh, a resident of Lohgaon, Taluka and District Parbhani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Land Ceiling Case Due to Limitation Bar. Suo Moto Enquiry Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Initiated After 17 Years Held Without Jurisdiction.

The petitioner, Madhavrao Laxmanrao Karhale, a resident of Parbhani, filed a return under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice in Land Ceiling Case Due to Inordinate Delay. Suo Motu Revision Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Initiated After 16 Years Held Unjustified as Original Order of Non-Surplus Holder Had Attained Finality.

The petitioner, Baban S/o Munjaji Shere, as legal representative of his deceased father Munjaji S/o Manaji, challenged a notice dated 13th July 1992 i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Ceiling Case — Natural Tank Area Included in Surplus Land Calculation. Land occupied by natural tank cannot be excluded from total holding under Section 21 of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961.

The appellants, Sou. Bhagyashreeraje w/o Shivajirao Dhanwatey and Shivajirao Vasantrao Dhanwatey, challenged the judgment of a learned Single Judge in...