Search Results for "SICOM"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "SICOM"

61 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 61 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Upholds Setting Aside of Arbitral Award for Patent Illegality and Violation of Natural Justice. Arbitrator's failure to consider vital evidence and crucial documents renders award patently illegal and liable to be set aside under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

3 Nov 2025

The appellant, M/s Leaf Bio-Tech Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against an order of the Ci...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Violation of Natural Justice and Public Policy. Failure to Provide Opportunity to Cross-Examine Key Witness and Non-Consideration of Vital Evidence Renders Award Patently Illegal.

3 Nov 2025

The appellant, M/s Leaf Bio-Tech Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against the order of the Ci...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Company Law Board Order — Transfer of Shares After BIFR Recommendation Void Under Section 536(2) Companies Act, 1956. Winding Up Deemed to Commence from Date of BIFR Recommendation Under Section 441(2) Companies Act, 1956.

4 Oct 2024

The appellants, Maharashtra Antibiotics and Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (MAPL) and Hindustan Antibiotics Ltd., challenged an order of the Company Law Board (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses SICOM's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Reference Application Held Not Barred by Limitation. Court affirms that limitation period for reference under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 runs from date of knowledge of award, not from date of award, and that SICOM as subsequent transferee cannot challenge reference on limitation.

30 Oct 2017

The case involves a first appeal filed by SICOM Limited against the award passed under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 in Land Acquisitio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Discriminatory Sales Tax Rules Under Article 226. Held that Rule 31B and Rule 31AA of the Bombay Sales Tax Rules, 1959 operate in different contexts and do not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.

24 Jan 2017

The petitioners, M/s Graphite India Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute — Upholds Award on Most Claims but Sets Aside Interest Rate. Dispute arose from delays in crude distribution system project; court held that arbitrator's findings on delay and damages were not perverse but interest rate of 18% was excessive and reduced to 9%.

30 Oct 2015

The petitioner, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., challenged an arbitral award dated 30 June 2005 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Sales Tax Attachment on Property Purchased in SARFAESI Auction — Priority of Secured Creditor Over Crown Debt. Attachment order set aside as property was sold by secured creditor under SARFAESI Act before attachment, and sales tax dues do not have priority over secured creditor's rights under Section 26E of SARFAESI Act.

16 Oct 2015

The petitioners, Sherwood Resorts Pvt. Ltd. and its shareholder, challenged an attachment order dated 29th April 2013 passed by the Sales Tax Officer ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows SICOM Petition to Enforce Guarantee Liability Under State Financial Corporations Act, 1951. Guarantors' Defense of Discharge Due to Variation in Contract Rejected as Guarantees Were Continuing and No Material Alteration Occurred.

14 Nov 2014

The petition was filed by SICOM Ltd., a State Financial Corporation, under Sections 31(1)(aa) and 32 of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951, se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows SICOM's Petitions Under Section 31(1)(aa) of SFC Act for Recovery of Term Loan Defaults. Financial Corporation Entitled to Enforcement of Security Interest Without Prior Adjudication of Liability.

25 Apr 2005

The petitioner, SICOM Limited, a deemed State Financial Corporation under Section 46 of the State Financial Corporation Act, 1951, filed a group of pe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows SICOM's Petition Against Guarantors Under Section 31(1)(aa) of SFC Act — Guarantors' Liability Is Co-extensive with Principal Debtor, No Need to Exhaust Remedies Against Principal Debtor First

13 Apr 2005

The petitioner, M/s. SICOM Limited, a State Financial Corporation, filed two petitions under Section 31(1)(aa) of the State Financial Corporation Act,...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)