Search Results for "Railway Rates Tribunal jurisdiction"

142 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 142 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Upholds Arbitral Award in Railway Contract Dispute — Interest Rate Reduced from 18% to 9%. The court held that the arbitrator's award did not violate public policy but reduced the interest rate as excessive under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Union of India, challenged an arbitral award dated 8 October 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Union of India Against Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute. Court Upholds Arbitrator's Interpretation of 'Fall Clause' in Repeat Order for Supply of PSC Sleepers Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India (Central Railway) against an order of a learned Single Judge dismissing its challenge under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds CAT Order in Railway Promotion Dispute — Criteria for Assessment of Candidates for PHOD Post Held Arbitrary. The Court directed review DPC for notional promotion from date juniors were promoted with consequential benefits.

The Union of India and another (petitioners) challenged the judgment and order dated 23rd January 2001 of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows IRCTC's Appeals in Catering Contract Dispute, Restricts Interference Under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration Act. Court holds that High Court erred in re-appreciating evidence and substituting its own view over arbitrator's findings on tariff revision.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Indian Railways Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd. (IRCTC) and other parties, setting aside the Delh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Arbitral Award in Favor of Contractor in Railway Contract Dispute — Extension of Time Granted Without Protest Bars Claim for Liquidated Damages and Interest on Delayed Payments is Allowed Under Interest Act, 1978.

The petitioner, Union of India, acting through the Chief Electrical Engineer (Construction), Central Railway, awarded a contract to the respondent, M/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MPSRTC's Challenge to Industrial Court Order on Special Allowance Ceiling. Unilateral Reduction of Special Allowance from 5% to 2.5% of Basic Pay Held as Unfair Labour Practice Under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Madhya Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (MPSRTC), challenged the orders dated 19th and 21st March 1996 passed by the Industria...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Addresses Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator; Validity of 20% Claim Cap Clause Under Scrutiny. The Court Examines Whether a Contractual Condition Limiting Arbitration to Claims Not Exceeding 20% of Contract Value Is Arbitrary and Discriminatory.

The dispute arose from a contract dated 7 May 2018 between a contractor and the Central Railways for the preparation of design and structural drawings...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Railway Bio-Diesel Supply Dispute — Fall Clause Interpretation Upheld. Court finds that comparing prices for different delivery distances without adjusting for freight is impermissible, and the arbitral tribunal's view is plausible.

The case involves a challenge by the Union of India (Central Railway) under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against an arbit...