Search Results for "Petroleum dealership"

65 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 65 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Ineligibility for IOCL Retail Outlet Dealership Due to Lack of Land Ownership. Petitioner placed in Group-3 as she failed to provide proof of ownership of land, and her claim of ownership based on unregistered agreement was not accepted.

The petitioner, Smt. Sharda W/o Arun Morghare, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a communicati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses LPG Distributor's Challenge Against Discontinuation of Home Delivery Charges Beyond Contract Territory. Principle of Legitimate Expectation Cannot Be Invoked Against Statutory Policy or When No Representation Was Made by the Authority.

The petitioner, M/s Jay Gas Agency, a proprietorship firm represented by Sneha Vilas Kulkarni, was appointed as an LPG distributor by Hindustan Petrol...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Rejection of Candidature for Retail Outlet Dealership Due to Non-Application of Mind and Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner's Candidature Was Rejected on Grounds Not Mentioned in the Advertisement or Brochure, and Without Providing an Opportunity to Explain.

The petitioner, Nikhil Dilipsing Rajput, applied for a retail outlet dealership pursuant to an advertisement dated 25.11.2018 issued by the Indian Oil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Ineligibility for RO Dealership Due to Caste Certificate Technicality — Petitioner's Caste Validity Certificate Issued Prior to Application Date Satisfies Requirement, Communication Quashed

The petitioner, Mahadev Tukaram Tonde, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a communication dated 16-02-20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37(1)(c) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Against Dismissal of Section 34 Challenge to Arbitral Award in Petroleum Dealer Dispute. The court remitted the matter for fresh consideration, maintaining interim arrangement for running of petrol pump.

The appellant, M/s Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in LPG Dealership Dispute — Termination Upheld as Valid. Arbitrator's findings on breach of agreement clauses and quantification of damages were not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Petitioner, Ms. Anila Gautam Jain, proprietress of M/s. Badal Agency, was appointed as a dealer by the Respondent, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation...