Search Results for "Owner's preferential right"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Owner's preferential right"

87 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 87 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Hindu Succession Act Pre-emption Case — Section 22 Applies to Agricultural Land. The Court held that Section 22 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, which confers a right of pre-emption upon co-heirs, applies to agricultural land, overruling the contrary view taken in Atam Prakash v. State of Haryana.

1 Jan 2026

The case involves a dispute between siblings who inherited agricultural land from their father, Nanhu, as Class I legal heirs under the Hindu Successi...

Supreme Court

"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights

8 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Landlord's Application for Possession and Rent Arrears from Official Liquidator in Company Liquidation. Landlord's Claim for Rent Arrears and Possession Upheld Under Section 476 of Companies Act, 1956.

30 Jun 2022

The applicant, Shri N R Ravi, claimed to be the owner of a property leased to M/s. SEM India Systems Private Limited (in liquidation) on 15.05.2008. T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. The Court held that the appellant-defendant failed to prove exclusive title by adverse possession and that the suit was not barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

6 Jan 2016

The dispute pertains to a suit for partition and separate possession of agricultural lands filed by the original plaintiff (respondent no.1) against t...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay hears challenge to constitutional validity of explanation inserted into Sections 65(105)(zzq) and 65(105)(zzzh) and clause (zzzzu) of the Finance Act 1994 by the Finance Act 2010. The impugned provisions deem construction services provided by a builder to a buyer in case of a new building intended for sale as a taxable service and bring preferential location charges within the service tax net.

19 Jan 2012

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of certain provisions introduced by the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Release of Seized Bullocks to Owner in Cruelty Case — Magistrate's Order Under Section 457 CrPC for Interim Custody on Bond Upheld. The court found no illegality in the Magistrate's order releasing 29 bullocks seized under Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act and Maharashtra Animal Preservation Act, subject to conditions.

5 Jul 2010

The petitioner, Shaikh Zakir Shaikh Nasir, a businessman dealing in sale and purchase of animals, had 29 bullocks seized by Sindkheda Police Station o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Release of Seized Bullocks to Owner in Cruelty to Animals Case — Upholds Magistrate's Order for Interim Custody Under Section 457 CrPC. The court restored the Magistrate's order directing release of 36 bullocks seized under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 and Maharashtra Animal Preservation Act, 1976, on a Suprutnama bond of Rs.1,75,000.

5 Jul 2010

The petitioner, Gulam Husain Khan Mustafa Khan, was a businessman dealing in sale and purchase of animals. The Sindkheda Police Station registered Cri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC when findings are based on appreciation of evidence and not perverse.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a property dispute between the appellants (original defendants) and the respondents (original plaintiffs) concerning land in Village...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Suit, Sets Aside Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Court Holds That Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Property, and That the Trial Court Erred in Decreeing the Suit Without Proper Consideration of Evidence.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a property dispute between the appellants (original defendants) and the respondents (original plaintiffs) over agricultural land. Th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Disposes of Appeals in Mining Lease Dispute – Withdrawal of Recommendation and Reservation Notifications Challenged.

1 Jan 1970

These appeals arise from a common judgment of the Jharkhand High Court dated April 4, 2007, dismissing writ petitions filed by several companies engag...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)