Search Results for "Order XXXVI CPC"

28 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 28 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NOTICE OF MOTION NO.955 OF 2018

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Interim Order in Commercial Arbitration Dispute. Court upholds Tribunal's power to grant interim relief under Section 17 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, but modifies order to balance interests of both parties.

The judgment arises from two commercial arbitration petitions filed by Mahaguj Collieries Limited (the petitioner) under Section 37 of the Arbitration...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Interim Order in Bank Guarantee Dispute. Court upholds restraint on encashment of bank guarantee subject to deposit of amount, finding no perversity in the Tribunal's order under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Mahaguj Collieries Limited, filed two arbitration petitions under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Amendment in Suit for Specific Performance to Include Alternative Relief of Refund of Advance Amount. Amendment Sought Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC and Section 22 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 Held Permissible as It Does Not Change Nature of Suit.

The petitioner, M/s. Samrudhi Groups, a registered partnership firm, filed a suit for specific performance of contract (O.S.No.281/2017) against the r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Court held that no substantial question of law arose as findings were based on appreciation of evidence and not perverse.

The judgment pertains to two second appeals arising from a property dispute among members of the Desai family. The appellants, original defendants 1 t...