Search Results for "Mutation entry"

22 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 22 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Disposes Writ Petition Under Article 227 of Constitution of India, Directs Trial Court to Reconsider Compromise Decree in Ancestral Property Dispute Involving Fraud Allegations

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India to quash a compromise decree in OS No. 123/2025, alleging it was frau...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Revenue Authorities' Orders Cancelling Mutation Entry - Petitioner's Agriculturist Status Upheld Under Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 - Mutation Entry No. 1884 Restored in Favour of Petitioner

The petitioner filed a Special Civil Application under Article 227 of Constitution of India challenging orders passed by revenue authorities cancellin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Rejection of Non-Agricultural Permission Under Gujarat Land Revenue Code. Competent Authority Cannot Inquire into Title Under Section 65 as Statute Requires Only Proof of Occupancy, Not Title Verification.

The dispute involved a writ petition challenging the rejection of Non-Agricultural permission for land use conversion. The petitioners had purchased a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Acquisition Proceedings Declared Lapsed. Non-payment of Compensation and Non-possession of Acquired Land for Over Five Years Resulted in Lapsing of Acquisition Proceedings Under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

Mere mutation entries without kabjepatti or credible evidence of possession do not establish the taking over of physical possession. Absence of notice...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Partition and Separate Possession Dispute: Ancestral vs. Self-Acquired Property – High Court Upholds Joint Family Property Status

High Court Clarifies Partition Rights in Joint Family Property, Rejects Prior Partition Claims Presumption of Joint Family Property: The Court held t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Aakarphod Patrak Not a Document of Title: Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Sub-Division Order. Court Holds Hissa Form No. 4 Does Not Confer Title; Upholds Minister’s Decision Declaring Aakarphod Patrak No. 12 of 1968 as Infructuous

Aakarphod Patrak/Hissa Form No. 4 – The Bombay High Court held that Aakarphod Patrak or Hissa Form No. 4 (based on the Gunakar Book) does not...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Adoption Does Not Divest Rights in Self-Acquired Property: Bombay High Court Upholds First Appellate Court’s Decision. Court Rules Adoption Does Not Affect Title Over Property Purchased Independently – Legal Effect of Adoption Deed Examined

Adoption and Property Rights: The Bombay High Court held that adoption does not divest an individual of rights over self-acquired property. The proper...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

The importance of timeliness in filing suits and the legal barriers to pursuing claims decades after the cause of action has arisen, especially when there are clear statutory limitations like those under the Limitation Act.

The dismissal of a civil suit based on an application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC). The key points of this case revolve a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Dispute Over Land Ownership and Tenancy Rights in Survey No. 73/1 at Mouje Rohinjan. Petitioner-Trust's Claim of Exemption Under Section 88-B of BT & AL Act Contested by Tenant's Rights and Historical Orders; MRT Decision Under Scrutiny.

This case involves a dispute over the land bearing Survey No. 73/1 at Mouje Rohinjan, with the petitioner claiming the land is part of their trust and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Overturns High Court Decision, Validates 1985 Sale Deed in Landmark Land Ownership Case. Appellants win long-fought legal battle over fraudulent land transactions; Supreme Court awards exemplary costs for injustice.

The case concerns issues of land ownership, fraud, and legal manipulation, with the appellants suffering due to the malicious intent of the respondent...