Search Results for "MERC tariff order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Ac...
High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Pay...

Search Results for "MERC tariff order"

25 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 25 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging MERC Regulation on Gross Station Heat Rate. Regulation 44.2(d) of the Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (Multi Year Tariff) Regulations, 2011 prescribing Gross Station Heat Rate norm for thermal generation stations is held valid and within the Commission's powers under the Electricity Act, 2003.

18 Apr 2016

The petitioners, Reliance Infrastructure Limited and its Deputy General Manager (Legal), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Electricity Theft Assessment Orders — Lack of Proper Hearing and Violation of Natural Justice. Assessment under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003 set aside due to failure to provide adequate opportunity to the consumer.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd., filed two writ petitions challenging assessment orders passed by the Superin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEB's Challenge to Sale of Captive Power to Third Party Without Licence Under Electricity Act, 2003. Captive Generating Plant Not Required to Obtain Licence for Sale to Another Industrial Consumer Under Section 9 Read With Section 42 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

4 Apr 2005

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB), filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Maharashtra State Electricity Regulator...

High Court

High Court Quashes CGRF Order Directing Revision of Energy Bills for HT Consumer on Express Feeder. Interpretation of 'Dedicated Distribution Facilities' under MERC Supply Code Regulations 2005 determines consumer classification.

21 Jun 2011

The Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL) filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Rajasthan Discoms Against APTEL Order Granting Change in Law Compensation to Power Generator. Interpretation of PPA Articles 10.2.1 and 10.5.1(ii) regarding supplementary bill and carrying cost is covered by earlier decisions.

1 Jan 2025

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal filed by Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. and other Rajasthan Discoms against an order of the Appellate Tribunal ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Electricity Company's Petition Challenging CGRF Order Directing Refund of Differential Tariff. Reclassification of Petrol Pump from Industrial to Commercial Tariff Upheld as Per Commercial Circular No.175 and MERC Tariff Order; CGRF Exceeded Jurisdiction by Not Considering Limitation Under Section 56(2) of Electricity Act, 2003.

27 Apr 2026

The petitioner, the Executive Engineer and Nodal Officer of Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd., challenged the order dated 29.06....

High Court

High Court of Bombay Upholds Electricity Ombudsman's Order Allowing Refund of Excess Tariff Charged to Industrial Consumer. Limitation Period Under MERC Regulations Not Applicable to Continuing Wrong of Wrongful Billing at Commercial Tariff Instead of Industrial Tariff.

18 Jul 2017

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), challenged the order dated 22/01/2016 passed by the Electricity O...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Against MSEDCL Over Tariff Categorization of LPG Bottling Plant as Industrial Activity. LPG Bottling Plant Held to Be Manufacturing Activity Entitling Petitioner to HT I Industrial Tariff Under MERC Tariff Order.

19 Jan 2012

The Petitioner, M/s. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, challenged the categorization of its LPG Gas Bottling Plant at Sangli under the HT II Co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Electricity Bill Based on Contract Demand Under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003 — Consumer Liable for Minimum Charges Even Without Actual Consumption. The court held that the consumer cannot unilaterally reduce contract demand and must pay minimum charges as per tariff, and Section 126 assessment for unauthorized use is not applicable when billing is based on contract demand.

27 Oct 2016

The petitioner, Dr. Vinay Tilokchand Karnavat, a medical practitioner running a hospital in Sillod, Aurangabad, filed a writ petition challenging the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Multi Year Tariff Regulations by Electricity Distribution Company — Procedural Compliance Upheld. Court holds that the Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission substantially complied with the requirement of previous publication under Section 181(3) of the Electricity Act, 2003, and the Conduct of Business Regulations, 2004.

15 Nov 2011

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd., challenged the Multi Year Tariff Regulations, 2011 framed by the Maharashtra ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)