Search Results for "MCGM guidelines"

89 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 89 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petitions Against Order Quashing MPSC Selection Process for Non-Compliance with Reservation Roster. Court Held That MPSC's Failure to Maintain 200-Point Roster for Backlog Vacancies Violated Constitutional Mandate Under Articles 16(4) and 16(4B).

The case involves multiple review petitions and a contempt petition arising from a writ petition filed by Makrand Subhash Dagadkhair challenging the s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Heritage Committee's Approval for Demolition of Heritage Building. Court holds that the Heritage Committee's decision is final and binding, and the petitioners failed to demonstrate any illegality or arbitrariness in the approval process.

The petitioners, Prakash V. Patel and Dilnar Jehanbux Chichgar, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court challenging the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging MCGM Contract Awards in Public Interest Litigation. Court Finds No Irregularity in Tender Process and Upholds Validity of Contracts for Road Works.

The present Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed by Jayshree Ramakant Khadilkar Pande challenging the award of four contracts by the Municipal C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA Order in Redevelopment Dispute — Upholds Developer's Right to Fair Hearing. Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976 Requires Compliance with Natural Justice Before Revoking Development Rights.

The petitioners, M/s Darshan Jayant Builders (a partnership firm) and its partner Pritesh M. Jain, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging TDR Loading and FSI Computation for Redevelopment Project. Court upholds MCGM's permission for TDR and fungible FSI, finding no illegality or public interest violation.

The petitioner, Nitesh Mohanlal Doshi, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the permission gr...