Search Results for "Karnataka Goonda Act"

30 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 30 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition, Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Non-supply of Translated Documents. Detention Order Held Violative of Article 22(5) as Kannada Translations of Relied-upon Court Order Sheets Were Not Furnished, Precluding Effective Representation.

The case arose from a habeas corpus petition filed by Smt. Jayamma, the mother of detenu Ravikumar @ Kumara @ Tango, challenging a preventive detentio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Non-Communication of Grounds in Known Language. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Violated as Grounds Were Served in English, Not in Kannada Which Detenu Understood.

The petitioner, Smt. Shylamma, mother of the detenu Abhishek @ Abhi @ Sutta, filed a habeas corpus petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Detention Order for Violation of Article 22(5) in Habeas Corpus Petition. Detenu's Right to Make Representation in Language Understood by Him Upheld, Detention Order Set Aside.

The petitioner, Smt. Surekha Deepak Shintre, wife of the detenu Deepak Shivaji Shintre, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Consti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Quashing Preventive Detention Order for Non-Application of Mind and Violation of Article 22(5). The court held that failure to communicate grounds of detention in a language understood by the detenu renders the detention illegal.

The petitioner, Yashoda, wife of the detenu Keshava Poojary @ Choni, filed a writ petition for habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Order for Non-Communication of Grounds in Known Language. Detenu's Right to Make Representation Under Article 22(5) Violated as Grounds Were Not Communicated in Tulu, a Language Known to Detenu.

The petitioner, Yashoda, wife of Keshava Poojary @ Choni, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the...