Search Results for "Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950"

58 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 58 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Landowners' Appeal in Tenancy Act Challenge — Ninth Schedule Protection Upheld. Provisions of Maharashtra Act 1961 and Hyderabad Act 1950 Inserted in Ninth Schedule by Constitution (Seventeenth Amendment) Act 1964 Held Immune from Challenge Under Articles 19 and 31 of the Constitution.

15 Apr 1969

The case concerns a constitutional challenge to the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Re-enactment, Validation and Further Amendment) Act, 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Against Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal Order Declaring Kishanrao Kadam as Tenant; Landlord Relies on Earlier Civil Decree and Findings of Tenancy Authorities

4 Jul 2012

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Tahsildar's Order Cancelling Mutation Entries in Tenancy Land Dispute — Exceeds Jurisdiction Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. Tahsildar Cannot Cancel Certificate Issued Under Section 38(E) of Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1950, as Such Power Lies Only with Revenue Tribunal or Civil Court.

16 Oct 2025

The petitioners, legal heirs of tenants Ganpati Kundlik Kurule and Abaji Ramji Jadhav, challenged the order dated 04.09.2025 passed by the Tahsildar, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Tenancy Dispute — Petitioner Fails to Prove Will and Default in Rent Payment. The court held that the petitioner, claiming as a legatee under a will, must prove the will and the tenant's default; mere mutation entry does not confer ownership.

15 Jun 2012

The petitioner, Subhash s/o Pandurang Bagal, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Aurangabad, dated 14th O...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Petition in Tenancy Dispute Over Delayed Payment of Purchase Price. Belated payment with interest and penalty before landlord's application does not render sale ineffective under Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

29 Jul 2019

The petitioners, Baburao Pandurang Madane and Vithal Pandurang Madane, were tenants of agricultural land survey No. 39/1 at village Kusmod, Taluka Mal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Petition in Tenancy Dispute Over Adoption Claim. Adoption of Petitioner Not Proved as Valid Under Hindu Law and Tenancy Act, Hence Tenant's Purchase Rights Upheld.

15 Jan 2010

The petitioner, Kishanrao Aukale, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Aurangabad, in Tenancy Case No.5...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Tahsildar's Order Cancelling Mutation Entries in Tenancy Land Dispute — Held That Tahsildar Lacks Jurisdiction to Cancel Certificate Issued Under Section 38(E) of Hyderabad Tenancy Act After 65 Years Without Notice to Affected Parties. The court held that the certificate under Section 38(E) of the Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1950 attains finality and cannot be cancelled by the Tahsildar after such a long lapse of time, and the order was passed in violation of natural justice.

16 Oct 2025

The petitioners, legal heirs of original tenants Ganpati Kundlik Kurule and Abaji Ramji Jadhav, challenged the order dated 04.09.2025 passed by the Ta...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Writ Petition Challenging Refusal to Issue Certificate of Purchase Under Bombay Tenancy Act. The Court held that the tenant's right to purchase land under Section 32G of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 is not barred by limitation despite delay in issuance of certificate, and the Mamlatdar's order was perverse.

4 May 2011

The petitioner, Mesaji S/o Laxman Ubare, was a tenant of agricultural land owned by the respondents. He claimed to have become a deemed purchaser of t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Agricultural Land Tribunal Order in Tenancy Dispute. Landlord-Tenant Relationship Established Under Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948; Sale Deed Held Invalid as Tenant Was in Possession.

27 Nov 2014

The petitioners, legal representatives of Maharudrappa Baslingappa Swami, filed a writ petition challenging the orders of the Agricultural Land Tribun...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Eviction Petition Under Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 — Tenant's Claim of Tenancy Rights Rejected as Landlord's Need for Personal Cultivation Established. The court held that the tenant's claim of purchase under Section 32 was barred by limitation and the landlord's bona fide need for personal cultivation under Section 31 was proved.

27 Jul 2017

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Bharat and Abhay Kulkarni (brothers) against orders of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (MRT) confir...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)