Search Results for "High Court inherent powers"

2713 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2713 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court on its Own Motion Proceeds Against Individual for Scandalous Facebook Posts Targeting Judges. Court Stresses That Such Vicious Attacks on Judiciary Constitute Gross Criminal Contempt Undermining Rule of Law.

Suo-motu criminal contempt proceedings were initiated by the Bombay High Court against an individual who, through his Facebook profile, published a se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Transfer of Writ Petitions and Contempt Petition from Aurangabad Bench to Principal Seat Under Bombay High Court (Appellate Side) Rules, 1960. Legality of Chief Justice's Administrative Transfer Orders and Validity of Proviso to Rule 2 of Chapter XXXI Raised.

The Bombay High Court heard three writ petitions filed by the Lawyers' Forum for General Utility & Litigating Public, Aurangabad, challenging the admi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers Questions on Eligibility of Judicial Officers for Direct Recruitment as District Judges to Constitution Bench — Interpretation of Article 233(2) of Constitution of India, 1950 Regarding Requirement of Continuous Practice as Advocate.

The Supreme Court, in a reference by a three-Judge Bench, examined substantial questions of law concerning the interpretation of Article 233(2) of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order Quashing FIR for Attempt to Murder Based on Compromise. High Court Mechanically Exercised Inherent Powers Under Section 482 CrPC Without Considering Gravity of Offence Under Section 307 IPC and Its Social Impact.

The State of Madhya Pradesh appealed against the High Court's order quashing criminal proceedings against Laxmi Narayan and others for offences under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Upholds Trial Court's Order Allowing Plaintiff to Adduce Evidence in Commercial Suit, Finding No Perversity or Jurisdictional Error. Order Passed Under Order 18 Rule 4(1B) CPC Not Violative of Embargo When Sufficient Cause Shown.

The dispute arose from a commercial summary suit (Commercial O.S. No. 1/2018) filed by a Class-I contractor before the Commercial Court at Raichur aga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Division Bench Pronounces Judgment on Constitutional Validity of Karnataka Civil Courts (Amendment) Act, 2023 and Karnataka High Court (Amendment) Act, 2023. The Verdict on the Appeal and Connected Petition Remains Unstated in the Available Excerpt of the Judgment.

The Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, comprising Chief Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice C.M. Poonacha, heard a writ appeal a...