Search Results for "Height restriction"

139 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 139 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Quashing of FIR in NDPS Act Case — Ignorance of Gazette Notification Not a Defence. Export of Controlled Substance Without NOC from Narcotics Commissioner Constitutes Prima Facie Offence Under Sections 9A, 25A, 29, 59 of NDPS Act.

The applicant, a director of Vivalavita Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., sought quashing of FIR No. 48 of 2019 registered by the Anti Drug Department, Azad ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Protecting Consumer Clarity in Pharmaceutical Markets

The case involves a dispute over trademark infringement between the plaintiff's "ZITA-MET" and the defendant's "XIGAMET" in the pharmaceutical sector....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Legal Dispute Over Termination of Developer's Appointment for SRS Implementation in Mumbai. Unraveling the Complexities of Land Allocation and Timely Implementation in Slum Rehabilitation Schemes in Maharashtra

Legal dispute regarding the termination of a developer's appointment for implementing a Slum Rehabilitation Scheme (SRS) in Mumbai under the Maharasht...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Part Occupation Certificate for Building Height Violation. Flat Purchasers Cannot Seek Revocation of Occupation Certificate as They Have Alternative Remedy Under RERA and No Vested Right to Challenge Planning Permissions.

The petitioners, Sanjay Phulwaria and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Construction of 38-Story Building in Cuffe Parade, Mumbai, Holding No Violation of CRZ Norms or FSI Regulations. The court found that the building was not located on a CRZ-I area and that the FSI granted was within permissible limits under DCR 58.

The petitioners, comprising residents' associations and trusts, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the construction of a 38-story building...