Search Results for "Food Analyst"

Trending :

Search Results for "Food Analyst"

142 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 142 result(s)

High Court

High Court Quashes Criminal Prosecution in Drugs & Cosmetics Act Case Due to Procedural Violations and Non-Compliance with Statutory Mandates. Prosecution was invalidated because of inordinate delay in sample testing, failure to dispatch sample portion to manufacturer depriving retesting right, and improper cognizance by Special Judge without committal under Section 193 CrPC, under Section 27(d) of Drugs & Cosmetics Act, 1940.

24 Mar 2026

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, in its criminal appellate jurisdiction, adjudicated a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of I...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Misbranded Food Case Due to Denial of Right to Re-test Sample Under Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954. The court held that the right to get a sample analysed by the Central Food Laboratory applies to misbranded food articles and denial of this right due to prosecution's negligence vitiates proceedings.

29 Nov 2019

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh dismissing the appellant's application under Section 482 CrPC for quashing an ord...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Petitioners in Food Adulteration Case — No Offence Made Out Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. Sale of 'Mint' and 'Saunf' Products Not Prohibited Under Section 26(2)(i) of FSS Act, 2006 as They Are Not 'Food' as Defined.

13 Sep 2019

The petitioners, Anand Ramdhani Chaurasia and Vijay Banarasi Chaurasia, were engaged in the business of selling 'Mint' and 'Saunf' products. On 12th J...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Food Adulteration Case Despite Procedural Lapses. Substantial Compliance of Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 Sufficient When No Prejudice Caused.

23 Jul 2019

The appellant Vijendra was convicted under Section 7(1)/16(1)(a)(i) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 for selling adulterated buffalo m...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Denial of Right to Re-Analysis. Accused Acquitted as Sample Became Unfit for Analysis Under Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

6 Mar 2018

The State of Maharashtra filed three appeals against the acquittal of the accused Harishchandra Sadhuram Agarwal, a vendor and proprietor of a kirana ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Conviction Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act for Selling Adulterated Groundnut Oil. Conviction and Sentence of 3 Months RI and Fine of Rs.1000 Upheld as Concurrent Findings of Fact Cannot Be Disturbed in Revision.

7 Aug 2017

The applicant, Santoshkumar Ramchandra Rathi, was convicted by the Chief Judicial Magistrate First Class, Wardha, on 17.9.1999 in Regular Criminal Cas...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Directs Food Authorities to Follow Due Process for Seizure of Confectionery Batches Exceeding Colour Limits, While Examining Legality of Lactic Acid Addition. The court held that the question of permissibility of lactic acid in sugar boiled confectionery under Regulation 2.7.1 of the Food Safety and Standards Regulations, 2011, is the core issue, and for the nine batches with excess colour, the prescribed sampling and analysis procedure must be followed.

19 Dec 2012

The petitioner, a manufacturer of sugar boiled confectionery products like 'Kaccha Mango Bite' and 'Mazelo', filed a writ petition challenging the sei...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows State Appeal in Food Adulteration Case — Acquittal Set Aside for Misbranding of Roasted Peanuts. Label on Sealed Packet Failed to Disclose Presence of Synthetic Food Colour 'Sunset Yellow' as Required Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 and Rules.

2 Aug 2010

The State of Goa, through Food Inspector Smt. Iva Fernandes, filed an appeal against the acquittal of the respondents, Selvom Athisavem and Manuel Ath...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Directors in Food Adulteration Case — Lack of Specific Allegations of Consent or Neglect. Directors Cannot Be Vicariously Liable Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 Without Clear Averments of Their Role in the Offence.

23 Jul 2010

The applicants, who are directors of M/s. Bunge India Private Limited, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedur...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Prosecution in Food Adulteration Case Due to Denial of Right to Second Report from Central Food Laboratory. Right under Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 frustrated by Food Inspectors' failure to preserve samples properly.

30 Nov 2005

The judgment pertains to two criminal miscellaneous applications filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by the applicants (R...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)