Search Results for "Exemption under ULC"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Exemption under ULC"

58 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 58 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Government's Insistence on Reservation of Tenements Under Urban Land Ceiling Act Scheme. Scheme Sanctioned Under Section 21 of Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 for Weaker Sections; Government's Demand for 10% Reservation of Built-Up Area for Its Nominees Held Unenforceable After Scheme Implementation.

7 Apr 2005

The 1st petitioner, Pratapsingh R. Pardeshi, was the owner of a property bearing survey no.119+204+205+206/1+209/1, plot no.5, situated at Lohegaon, T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Implementation of Government Resolutions for Regularisation of Surplus Vacant Land Under ULC Act — Petitioner Entitled to Benefit of Policy Despite Earlier Exemption Order. Court Directs Respondents to Raise Demand for Premium and Upon Payment, Relieve Petitioner of Exemption Conditions.

30 Mar 2023

The petitioners, Salim Alimahomed Porbanderwalla (owner of land CTS Nos. 124 and 125, Village Marol, Andheri, measuring about 17492.70 sq mtrs) and Sh...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Urban Land Ceiling Case — Possession Not Validly Taken Under Section 10(6) of ULC Act, 1976. Act of Court Should Not Injure Suitor; Repeal of ULC Act in 2008 Vests Land in Appellant.

3 Mar 2025

The appellant, M/S A.P. Electrical Equipment Corporation (now ECE Industries Limited), owned land in Fatehnagar Village, Rangareddy District, Telangan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against State's Allotment of Surplus Land Under ULC Act — Petitioner Failed to Establish Any Right After Repeal. Land vested in the State under Sections 8, 9, and 10 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, prior to its repeal, remains with the State and cannot revert merely because the Act was subsequently repealed.

27 Oct 2016

The matter before the Bombay High Court arose from a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by Chhaganlal Khimji and Co. L...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Directs State Not to Initiate ULC Proceedings Against Petitioner in Respect of Land Already Declared Surplus in Brother's Name. The Court held that once proceedings under the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976 were concluded against the brother, the same land cannot be subjected to fresh proceedings against the petitioner.

5 Jun 2013

The petitioner, Ningaiah, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the respondents not to ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Declaring Abatement of ULC Proceedings and Non-Vesting of Land Under Repeal Act. Landowner's Surplus Land Declaration Under Sections 8(4), 9, and 10 of Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 Held to Have Abated as Physical Possession Not Taken Before Repeal Act Came Into Force.

13 Sep 2019

The petitioner, Smt. Tarabai Tulshiram Meshram, filed a writ petition seeking a declaration that all proceedings under Sections 9 and 10 of the Urban ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PILs Challenging Construction in Powai and Tirandaz — No Breach of Tripartite Agreement or ULC Act Exemption Found. The court held that the construction was in accordance with sanctioned plans and permissions, and the challenge to the exemption order was barred by delay and laches.

22 Feb 2012

The judgment concerns three Public Interest Litigations (PILs) filed by Kamlakar Motiram Satve, Rajendra Thacker, and Medha Patkar challenging the con...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Declaration That ULC Act Proceedings Lapsed Upon Repeal — Land in Village Drugdhamna Not Vested in State as Possession Not Taken Prior to Repeal Act, 1999. The court held that under Section 3 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999, proceedings under the ULC Act lapse if possession of the land has not been taken before the repeal, and the land does not vest in the State.

7 Jun 2019

The petitioners, Sunilkumar Motilal Sharma, Sushilkumar Motilal Sharma, Subhashkumar Ratanlal Sharma, and the legal representatives of Smt. Sunita Ume...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Challenge to Land Ownership in Urban Land Ceiling Case — Successor Corporation Cannot Reopen Final Orders Under ULC Act After Vesting of Land in State.

13 Aug 2014

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition and a second appeal filed by the Sangli Miraj Kupwad Cities Municipal Corporation (successor of Miraj ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Urban Land Ceiling Case — Possession Validly Taken Under Section 10(5) of ULC Act Before Repeal. Application Under Section 21 Was Barred by Limitation, and Repeal Did Not Affect Lands Where Possession Was Already Taken.

6 May 2020

The appeal arose from a dispute concerning surplus land under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976. The appellants, legal representatives...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)