Search Results for "Duty to consider"

17 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 17 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Consideration of Representation for Shifting TASMAC Liquor Shop from Temple Land. Court orders District Collector to decide on representation within three months without expressing views on merits.

The petitioner, S. Kodieswaran, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Consideration of Representation for Removal of Encroachments on Highway — Petitioner Directed to File Fresh Representation. Statutory Authority Must Consider Representation on Merits Within Three Months Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Vinoth Venugopal, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the second...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Authorities to Consider Representation for Bridge Construction in Madurai — Mandamus Issued for Disposal Within Three Months. Statutory Authority Has Duty to Consider Representation; Non-Consideration Amounts to Dereliction of Duty Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, MCN.Manickam, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Consideration of Representation for Including Village in Jallikattu Gazette Notification. Petitioner sought mandamus for inclusion of village in Tamil Nadu Government Gazette for conducting Jallikattu; Court directed respondents to consider representation within three months.

The petitioner, David Inbaraj, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court ...