Search Results for "District Judiciary"

777 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 777 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Full Bench Considers Validity of Rule Excluding Full-Time Salaried Assistant Public Prosecutors from District Judge Appointments. The case concerns interpretation of 'advocate' under Article 233(2) of the Constitution and consistency with Supreme Court precedent.

The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court heard a reference arising from a writ petition filed by six Assistant Public Prosecutors employed on a full-ti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court on its Own Motion Proceeds Against Individual for Scandalous Facebook Posts Targeting Judges. Court Stresses That Such Vicious Attacks on Judiciary Constitute Gross Criminal Contempt Undermining Rule of Law.

Suo-motu criminal contempt proceedings were initiated by the Bombay High Court against an individual who, through his Facebook profile, published a se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of State of Assam Against High Court's Quo Warranto Declaring District Judge Appointment Void. Governor's Promotion of Judicial Officer to Additional District Judge Under Article 233 Upheld as Valid, High Court's Interpretation Rejected.

The Supreme Court of India allowed an appeal by the State of Assam against a judgment of the Assam and Nagaland High Court that had issued a writ of q...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Judicial Officer Discharged During Probation and Quashes Discharge Order. Discharge Based on Bail Order and Pending Inquiry Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice and Is Arbitrary Under Rajasthan Judicial Services Rules, 2010 and Article 233 of Constitution of India.

The dispute involved a judicial officer appointed as an Additional District Judge in 2013 under the Rajasthan Judicial Services Rules, 2010, who was d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Ineligibility for Judicial Appointment Due to Absence in Examination, Not Failure. Distinction between 'failure' and 'absence' in examination eligibility criteria for appointment as Civil Judge, Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate, First Class.

The petitioner, Harsha d/o Bhikaji Gadekar, applied for the post of Civil Judge, Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate, First Class (CJJD and JMFC) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

The High Court of Karnataka Division Bench heard writ appeals against the order of the learned Single Judge in a service matter involving judicial officers. The appeals were filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, challenging the order dated 27-09-2013 in WP Nos. 41684-691/2012.

These writ appeals, filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, arise from a common order dated 27-09-2013 passed by a learned Single...