Search Results for "Distribution Open Access Regulations"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Distribution Open Access Regulations"

133 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 133 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Full Bench adjudicates the limitation period for recovery of electricity charges under Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Conflicting Division Bench decisions on whether dues beyond two years can be recovered when not continuously shown as arrears are reconciled.

12 Mar 2019

The case originated from a writ petition challenging an order of the Electricity Ombudsman regarding recovery of electricity dues for a period beyond ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MCGM's Challenge to MERC Regulation on Compensation for Delayed Electricity Connections. Regulation 4.10 requiring compensation for failure to provide new connections within stipulated time is held valid under Section 181 read with Section 57 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

2 Mar 2016

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), a statutory corporation and local authority, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Consti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Lease of Playground to Trust for School Construction. Lease of Public Land for Educational Purpose Held Valid as Playground Not Reserved as Recreational Ground in Development Plan.

13 Mar 2013

The petitioners, residents of Oshiwara and Lokhandwala area of Mumbai, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) on 13/08/2012 challenging the lease of...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Distribution Licensee's Right to Levy Wheeling Charges on 110 kV Feeders — 110 kV HPCL Feeders Held Integral Part of Distribution Network Despite Voltage Level. The Court held that the functional use of the feeders for distribution to a single consumer, HPCL, determines their classification as distribution assets, not merely the voltage level under CEA Regulations, 2010.

3 Apr 2020

The case involves a dispute between Sai Wardha Power Generation Limited (SWPGL) and Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (HPCL) on one side, and Ta...

High Court

Bombay High Court Addresses Jurisdictional Clash Between Forward Markets Commission and Central Electricity Regulatory Commission Over Electricity Futures Trading. The Court Considered Whether the Electricity Act, 2003 Overrides the Forward Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1952, and Whether the Power Market Regulations 2010 Framed by CERC Were Ultra Vires.

7 Feb 2011

The matter involved two writ petitions being heard together by the Bombay High Court, arising from a jurisdictional conflict between two regulatory bo...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds KERC Regulations on Renewable Purchase Obligation for Captive Users. Regulations Requiring Captive Power Producers to Purchase Renewable Energy or Certificates Are Within Jurisdiction Under Electricity Act, 2003.

2 Apr 2014

The petitioners, The South Indian Sugar Mills Association and Davangere Sugar Company Pvt. Ltd. (in W.P.Nos.7603-04/2012) and Shree Renuka Sugar Mills...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MCGM's Challenge to MERC Regulation on Compensation for Delayed Electricity Connections. Regulation 4.10 requiring distribution licensees to pay compensation for failure to provide new connections within stipulated period is valid and not ultra vires the Electricity Act, 2003.

2 Mar 2016

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), through its Brihanmumbai Electric Supply & Transport Undertaking (BES&T), filed a writ petition un...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Distribution Licensee, Holds Captive Users Not Liable for Additional Surcharge Under Section 42(4) of Electricity Act, 2003. Captive generation and open access for self-consumption are statutory rights under Section 9, not requiring State Commission permission, thus additional surcharge is not leviable.

10 Dec 2021

The case involves an appeal by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. (the distribution licensee) against the order of the Appellate Trib...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Examines Locus Standi and Transparency Challenges in MIDC Land Allotment Case. Individual partner's writ petition held not maintainable due to lack of authorization from partnership firm; however, broader policy challenge regarding MIDC's online priority allotment without public advertisement kept open for consideration.

8 Dec 2025

The writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenged the decisions of the Minor Modification Committee and Land Allotm...

High Court

Full Bench of Bombay High Court Examines Fee Reimbursement Scheme Restriction for Minority Institution Students. Court Tasked with Resolving Conflicting Precedents on Whether Limiting Reimbursement to CAP-Admitted Students Is Discriminatory.

29 May 2020

The case concerned a challenge to a Government Resolution (GR) dated 27.02.2013 issued by the State of Maharashtra, which restricted fee reimbursement...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)