Search Results for "Directory provision"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Directory provision"

342 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 342 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award as Not Maintainable Due to Failure to Issue Prior Notice Under Section 34(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court Held That the Requirement of Prior Notice Is Mandatory and a Condition Precedent for Filing a Section 34 Application.

19 Apr 2018

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Canara Bank's Appeal in Disciplinary Reversion Case — Division Bench Exceeded Scope of Judicial Review. Regulation 10 of Canara Bank Officer Employees' (Discipline and Appeal) Regulations, 1976 is Directory, Not Mandatory.

12 May 2026

The case involves a disciplinary action taken by Appellants against its Senior Manager, Respondents, who was reduced from SMG Scale-IV to MMG Scale-II...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Nomination for Workmen Director in Nationalised Bank. The court held that the Central Government's approval is mandatory for appointment of Workmen Director under Section 9(3)(c) of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970, and the Bank cannot unilaterally accept nominations.

8 Apr 2011

The petitioners, Federation of Bank of India Staff Unions and its Deputy General Secretary, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitutio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging DRT Orders Under SARFAESI Act — Petitioner Failed to Show Jurisdictional Error or Violation of Natural Justice. The court held that the petitioner had an alternative remedy of appeal under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, and no exceptional grounds were made out for interference under Article 226.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Phoenix ARC Private Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, acting as a trust, filed two writ petitions under Art...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Corporation's Land Acquisition for Road Construction Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act. Municipal Corporation Validly Exercised Independent Powers Under MMC Act Without Requiring Road Inclusion in Development Plan Under MRTP Act, With Public Interest Justifying Acquisition Despite Property Owners' Objections.

2 Sep 2022

The dispute originated from the Municipal Corporation of Mumbai's efforts to acquire portions of the appellants' property for constructing a link road...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court upheld the summoning of additional accused post-trial conclusion, emphasizing the High Court’s revisional powers and the necessity of fresh trials to ensure justice.

6 Mar 2025

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Section 319 — Summoning of Additional Accused Post-Trial Conclusion Held Valid — Reiteration of Revi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Validity of RERA Rules Requiring Registration of Ongoing Projects Without Prior Approvals. Rule 18(8) and Rule 31(9) of Karnataka Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Rules 2017 held intra vires the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

5 Mar 2021

The case involves three writ appeals filed by real estate developers (M/s. Panchmal Properties, M/s. Sri Nandana Builders, and another) against an ord...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows State's Writ Petition Against Rejection of Written Statement — Delay Condoned Due to Administrative Bottlenecks. Order VIII Rule 1 CPC Held Directory; Trial Court Directed to Consider Condonation Application on Merits.

11 Oct 2011

The State of Goa and its officers (petitioners) filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 4 June 2011 passed by the learned Principal District ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs Governments to Provide Ex Gratia Compensation for Covid-19 Deaths Under Disaster Management Act. The court held that Section 12 of the Disaster Management Act, 2005 imposes a mandatory obligation to recommend guidelines for ex gratia assistance, and financial constraints cannot override statutory and constitutional duties under Article 21 of the Constitution.

30 Jun 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard two writ petitions filed in public interest by Reepak Kansal and Gaurav Kumar Bansal against the Union of India and o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute Between Co-Owners — Appellate Court Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Order 39 Rule 11 CPC. Discretionary Power Under Order 39 Rule 11 CPC Cannot Be Exercised Mechanically Without Showing Prejudice.

20 Mar 2017

The case involves a property dispute between two brothers, Shashikant Yeshwant Pal and Tanaji Yeshwant Pal, and their respective wives, over a house p...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)