Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Section 319 — Summoning of Additional Accused Post-Trial Conclusion Held Valid — Reiteration of Revisional Court’s Powers and Principle of "Relating Back."

Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 21 — Right to Fair Trial — Ensuring Justice Not Defeated by Procedural Technicalities — Held, Section 319 CrPC’s Application After Trial’s Conclusion Valid If Ordered by Revisional Court — High Court’s Power Under Sections 397 and 401 CrPC to Rectify Jurisdictional Errors Reaffirmed — Principle of "Relating Back" Applied to Maintain Trial Court’s Authority — (Paras 64-69, 101-104)

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Section 319 — Power to Summon Additional Accused — Fresh Trial and Re-Hearing of Witnesses Mandated to Avoid Prejudice — Timing of Summoning Order Deemed Less Crucial When Revisional Court’s Order Takes Effect — (Paras 18-19, 42-49, 105-109)

a) Application of Section 319 CrPC — Reiterated That Courts Must Decide Summoning of Additional Accused Before Final Judgment in Primary Case — (Paras 22-27, 51-57)

b) Revisional Jurisdiction of High Court — Power to Correct Legal Defects and Ensure Proper Administration of Justice — Emphasized Timeliness in Exercising Section 319 Powers — (Paras 76-80, 94-100)

c) Principle of "Relating Back" — High Court’s Order in Revision Replaces and Takes Effect From Date of Trial Court’s Original Decision — Ensured No Offender Escapes Trial Due to Procedural Lapses — (Paras 81-85)

Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Sections 147, 148, 149, 302 — Allegation of Unlawful Assembly and Murder — FIR Filed and Chargesheet Submitted Against Two Accused — Summoning of Remaining Accused Based on Testimonies of Prosecution Witnesses Upheld — (Paras 3-5, 18-19)

Supreme Court Affirmed High Court’s Observations — Directed Trial Court to Enforce Summoning Order and Ensure Appellants Appear for Trial — All Pending Applications Disposed

Appeal Dismissed — High Court’s Revisional Order Upheld — Trial Court’s Summoning of Additional Accused Valid

Subjects: Criminal Procedure Code, Summoning Additional Accused, Revisional Jurisdiction, Principle of Relating Back, Fair Trial, Fresh Trial, Judicial Powers

Nature of Litigation: Criminal Appeal — Arising from High Court’s Judgment Affirming Summoning Order Under Section 319 CrPC

Relief Sought: Appellants Sought Quashing of Summoning Order Issued by Trial Court

Reason for Filing: Challenge Against High Court’s Dismissal of Application Under Section 482 CrPC — Contesting Validity of Summoning Additional Accused After Trial Conclusion

Previous Decisions: High Court Affirmed Trial Court’s Order Summoning Additional Accused — Supreme Court Granted Leave to Appeal

Issues:

1. Whether Additional Accused Can Be Summoned Under Section 319 CrPC After Trial’s Conclusion?
2. Whether High Court’s Revisional Jurisdiction Permits Reconsideration of Summoning Applications After Trial?

Submissions:

State’s Counsel Argued:

1. Summoning Under Section 319 CrPC After Trial’s Conclusion Well-Settled in Law — Not Legally Erroneous
2. High Court Rightly Considered Section 319(4) Mandating Fresh Trial and Re-Hearing of Witnesses — (Para 21)

Ratio Decidendi:

1. Powers Under Section 319 CrPC Extend to Summoning Additional Accused Post-Trial Conclusion When Directed by Revisional Court — (Paras 101-104)
2. Principle of "Relating Back" Ensures Revisional Court’s Order Takes Effect From Date of Original Trial Court Decision — (Paras 64-69)
3. Fresh Trial and Re-Hearing of Witnesses Mandated to Prevent Prejudice Against Summoned Accused — (Paras 42-49)