Search Results for "Direct Port Delivery"

119 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 119 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Commercial Dispute Over Berth Reservation Agreement — Restores Arbitral Award. Court Holds That Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Limitation and Merits Were Not Perverse and Did Not Warrant Interference Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, M/s.X-Press Container Lines (UK) Ltd., entered into a Berth Reservation Agreement with the respondent, the Board of Trustees of the Por...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Appeal by Appellant Against Respondent in Money Claim Suit, Reverses Trial Court's Dismissal on Ownership Grounds Under Major Port Trusts Act, 1963

Appellant, a U.K.-based company, appealed against the Bombay City Civil Court's order dismissing its suit for money claim regarding goods sold by auct...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Forest Department Transit Fee on Imported Timber. Imported timber from foreign country is not 'forest produce' under Maharashtra Forest Rules, 1970, and no transit fee can be levied for its transportation from port to customs CFS.

The petitioner, Omprakash Nagoja, a sole proprietor of O.P.M. International, imported timber from a foreign country. The timber arrived at Jawaharlal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Enforcement of Customs Facility Notice Against Shipping Lines. No Statutory Duty Imposed on Customs to Prosecute Shipping Lines for Non-Compliance with Facility Notice No.69 of 2011.

The petitioners, J.J. Polyplast Private Ltd, Aishwarya Plast Exports Private Ltd, and Mr. Sanjesh Jain, are importers dealing in plastic raw materials...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Answers Reference Against Assessee in Sales Tax Case — Delivery Orders Not Documents of Title. Delivery orders issued by bankers against airways bills are not documents of title to goods and are not negotiable under section 2(4) of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930.

The judgment involves multiple Sales Tax References under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, where the common question of law was whether delivery orders...