Search Results for "Classification of goods"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "Classification of goods"

18 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 18 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Challenge to Clarification Order and Section 60(8) of KVAT Act — Upholds Tax Rate of 14.5% on Diapers, Under-pads, and Sanitary Napkins. Commissioner's Clarification Overruling Advance Ruling Authority Upheld as Valid Exercise of Power Under Section 60(8) of Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003.

23 Oct 2017

The petitioner, M/s Bella Premier Happy Hygiene Care Private Limited, a manufacturer of 'All-in-one Diapers, Under-pads and Sanitary Napkins', challen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Customs Drawback Classification Dispute — Stainless Steel Bright Bars of Austenitic Variety Classifiable as Bright Steel Bars Under Sub-Serial No. 3606. The Court held that the product description 'Bright Steel Bars' in the drawback schedule includes stainless steel bright bars, and the Department's reclassification under sub-serial No. 3803 was erroneous.

13 Oct 2017

The Petitioners, India Steel Industries and its partner H.B. Gupta, are manufacturers of stainless steel articles conforming to grade AISI 304 of Aust...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Clarification on Tax Rate for Blood Bank Equipments Under KVAT Act, 2003 — Goods Held to Fall Under Entry 61 of Third Schedule as Medical Equipment. The court quashed the Commissioner's clarification that Blood Collection Monitors, Blood Storage Refrigerators, Deep Freezers, Platelet Agitators with Incubators, Plasma Expressers, and Cryobaths are not medical equipment under Entry 61 of the Third Schedule to the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003.

11 Sep 2017

The petitioner, Aditya Surgical Co., a dealer in blood bank equipments and other medical equipments, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice and Order in Central Excise Classification Dispute — Stators and Rotors of Hermetic Motors Classifiable as Parts of Electric Motors, Not Compressors. Approved Classification Lists Cannot Be Reopened Without Fresh Material Under Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944.

23 Jan 2017

The petitioner, Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd., a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, challenged a show cause notice dat...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in KVAT Act Classification Case — Mango Juc-Fit and Other Products Held to Be Fruit Products Under Entry 16 of Third Schedule. The Court ruled that the products are covered by the specific entry for fruit products and not unscheduled goods, reversing the Commissioner's revisional order.

27 Apr 2016

The appellant, M/s. Rasna Private Limited, a dealer under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act), sought a clarification from the Advance ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Petition of Dealer in VAT Classification Dispute — 'Nutralite' Held to Be Edible Oil Under Entry 31 of Third Schedule to KVAT Act, 2003. The court quashed the order classifying the product as unscheduled goods, ruling that a fat spread primarily composed of edible oil is taxable as edible oil.

22 Mar 2016

The petitioner, M/s. Pioneer Marketing, a registered dealer under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act), deals with a product called 'Nut...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in KVAT Act Classification Dispute — Authority for Clarification & Advance Rulings Not Properly Constituted Under Section 60. Product 'Yakult' Held Entitled to Benefit of Entry 19 of First Schedule as Milk Product, Taxable at 4% Not 14%.

30 Sep 2015

The appellant, Yakult Danone India Pvt Ltd, is the manufacturer of a product called 'Yakult', which it claimed is akin to 'lassi' and thus a milk prod...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Tribunal's Classification of Washing Machine as Electronic Appliance Under Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 — Department's Reference Dismissed. The court held that an 'Onida Electronics Washing Machine' falls under Entry CII97(b) (electronic appliances) taxable at 4%, not under Entry CII73(a) (electrical appliances) taxable at 15%.

18 Mar 2010

The case involved a reference under Section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 (BST Act) at the instance of the Commissioner of Sales Tax, Mahara...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)