Search Results for "Ceiling area"

494 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 494 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Rejection of N.A. Use Permission in Ceiling Case. Ceiling Proceedings Dropped and Land Allotted to Cooperative Society, Subsequent Purchaser Cannot Be Denied Permission Under Section 65 of Gujarat Land Revenue Code, 1879.

The petitioner, Hirenbhai Meghajibhai Dhameliya, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Gujarat H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Petitioners in DCR Interpretation Case Following Supreme Court's Godrej & Boyce Ruling. The Court Holds That Paragraph 6 of Appendix VII Entitles Owner to DRC Equal to Area of Constructed Amenity, Rejecting Circulars Limiting to 25%.

Background: The consolidated writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay under Article 226 of the Constitution concerning ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Ceiling Case — Natural Tank Area Included in Surplus Land Calculation. Land occupied by natural tank cannot be excluded from total holding under Section 21 of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961.

The appellants, Sou. Bhagyashreeraje w/o Shivajirao Dhanwatey and Shivajirao Vasantrao Dhanwatey, challenged the judgment of a learned Single Judge in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Land Ceiling Revision Case Due to Inordinate Delay. Suo Motu Revision Initiated After 15 Years Without Calling for Record Held Invalid Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Uttamrao Sampatrao Thakur, a resident of Hivara Bk., Majalgaon, Beed, filed returns under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Land Ceiling Case Due to Limitation Bar. Suo Motu Revision Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Initiated Beyond Three-Year Period Is Without Jurisdiction.

The petitioner, Ghanshyam Tukaram Solunke, was an original land holder in proceedings under the Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Restrains Developers from Constructing Additional Buildings in Multi-Building Scheme Without Flat Owners' Consent Under MOFA. Disclosure of Potential Additional Construction Held Insufficient Where Specific Representations Were Made About FSI Utilisation and Layout.

The dispute centered on a 230-acre development known as the Powai Area Development Scheme (PADS), in which several cooperative housing societies of co...