Search Results for "CASS scrutiny"

27 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 27 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Income Tax Dispute — Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Act, 2020 Applicability. Court holds that a Miscellaneous Application under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 filed against an appeal dismissed in limine is covered under the DTVSV Act, 2020.

The petitioner, Oerlikon Balzers Coating India Private Limited, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the rejection ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Reason to Believe. Section 148 Notice Set Aside as Reopening Based on Mere Change of Opinion Without Fresh Tangible Material.

The petitioner, Asian Paints Ltd., a public limited company engaged in manufacturing and selling paints, challenged a notice dated 31st March 2021 iss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case for Lack of Reasonable Belief of Income Escapement. Notice under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 set aside as reasons recorded were based on mere change of opinion and not on fresh material.

The petitioner, Asian Paints Ltd., a public limited company engaged in manufacturing and selling paints, challenged a notice dated 31st March 2021 iss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Reassessment Based on Change of Opinion on Deduction Under Section 10AA of Income Tax Act, 1961 is Invalid.

The petitioner, Oracle Financial Services Software Limited, is a company engaged in providing information technology solutions to banks and financial ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Draft Assessment Order in Faceless Assessment Scheme for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice. Petitioner's Objections Not Considered and No Personal Hearing Granted Despite Request Under Section 144B of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Piramal Enterprises Limited, a registered company engaged in pharmaceutical manufacturing and trading, filed its original return of in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Assessment Order in Transfer Pricing Case for Violation of Natural Justice — Failure to Provide Show-Cause Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Renders Order Invalid. Petitioner's Objections to Draft Assessment Order Not Considered, Violating Section 144C of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, SHL (India) Private Limited, an Indian company and part of the SHL Group, United Kingdom, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of t...