Bombay High Court Quashes Assessment Order in Transfer Pricing Case for Violation of Natural Justice — Failure to Provide Show-Cause Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Renders Order Invalid. Petitioner's Objections to Draft Assessment Order Not Considered, Violating Section 144C of Income Tax Act, 1961.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, SHL (India) Private Limited, an Indian company and part of the SHL Group, United Kingdom, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the final assessment order dated 6th April 2021 passed by the National e-Assessment Centre, Delhi under Section 143(3) read with Sections 143(3A) and 143(3B) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (IT Act) for the Assessment Year 2017-2018. The petitioner also challenged the notice of demand under Section 156 and penalty notice under Section 274 read with Section 270A of the IT Act. The petitioner had filed its return of income on 30th March 2018 declaring total income of Rs.1,01,31,750/-. During the assessment year, the petitioner had entered into international transactions with its Associated Enterprise (AE) and had filed Form 3CEB along with the return. The case was selected under the Computer Assisted Scrutiny Scheme (CASS). The Assessing Officer passed a draft assessment order under Section 144C of the IT Act proposing certain additions. The petitioner filed objections before the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP), but the DRP did not consider them as they were not filed within the prescribed time. Subsequently, the final assessment order was passed without providing any show-cause notice or opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner contended that the final assessment order was passed in violation of principles of natural justice as no show-cause notice was issued and no opportunity of hearing was given before passing the order. The respondents argued that the petitioner had not filed objections within the time limit and therefore the DRP could not consider them, and the final order was valid. The court held that the failure to provide a show-cause notice and opportunity of hearing before passing the final assessment order violated the principles of natural justice. The court quashed the final assessment order, notice of demand, and penalty notice, and remanded the matter back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration after providing a show-cause notice and opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The court directed that the petitioner be given a reasonable opportunity to present its case.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Article 226 - Writ Jurisdiction - Challenge to Assessment Order - Petitioner challenged final assessment order under Article 226 of the Constitution of India on grounds of violation of principles of natural justice. Court held that failure to provide show-cause notice and opportunity of hearing before passing final assessment order renders the order invalid and liable to be quashed. (Paras 1, 10-15)

B) Income Tax - Transfer Pricing - Section 144C - Draft Assessment Order - Objections - The Assessing Officer passed a draft assessment order under Section 144C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, but the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) did not consider the petitioner's objections as they were not filed within the prescribed time. However, the final assessment order was passed without providing a show-cause notice or opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Court held that the failure to provide natural justice vitiates the assessment order. (Paras 3-9, 16-20)

C) Income Tax - Natural Justice - Show-Cause Notice - Opportunity of Hearing - The court emphasized that principles of natural justice require that before passing any adverse order, the assessee must be given a show-cause notice and an opportunity of being heard. The absence of such opportunity renders the order invalid. (Paras 10-15)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the final assessment order passed under Section 143(3) read with Sections 143(3A) and 143(3B) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, without providing a show-cause notice and without considering the petitioner's objections to the draft assessment order, is valid in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court quashed the final assessment order dated 6th April 2021, the notice of demand under Section 156, and the penalty notice under Section 274 read with Section 270A of the IT Act. The matter was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration after providing a show-cause notice and opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • Show-cause notice
  • Opportunity of hearing
  • Transfer pricing
  • Draft assessment order
  • Objections
  • Section 144C
  • Income Tax Act
  • 1961
  • Article 226
  • Constitution of India
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (BOM) (07) 26

WRIT PETITION (L) NO.11293 OF 2021

2021-07-28

SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, ABHAY AHUJA

Mr.P.F. Kaka, Senior Advocate and Mr. Divesh Chawla i/by Atul K. Jasani for Petitioner; Mr. Sham Walve for Respondents

SHL (India) Private Limited

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-8(2)(1), Mumbai; Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax/Income-tax Officer, National e-Assessment Centre, Delhi; The Union of India

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging final assessment order, notice of demand, and penalty notice under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of final assessment order dated 6th April 2021, notice of demand under Section 156, and penalty notice under Section 274 read with Section 270A of the IT Act.

Filing Reason

Petitioner challenged the assessment order on the ground that it was passed without providing a show-cause notice and opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice.

Previous Decisions

The Assessing Officer passed a draft assessment order under Section 144C of the IT Act. The petitioner filed objections before the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP), but the DRP did not consider them as they were not filed within the prescribed time. Subsequently, the final assessment order was passed.

Issues

Whether the final assessment order passed under Section 143(3) read with Sections 143(3A) and 143(3B) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, without providing a show-cause notice and without considering the petitioner's objections to the draft assessment order, is valid in law. Whether the failure to provide an opportunity of hearing before passing the final assessment order violates principles of natural justice.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the final assessment order was passed in violation of principles of natural justice as no show-cause notice was issued and no opportunity of hearing was given before passing the order. Respondents argued that the petitioner had not filed objections within the time limit and therefore the DRP could not consider them, and the final order was valid.

Ratio Decidendi

The failure to provide a show-cause notice and opportunity of hearing before passing a final assessment order violates the principles of natural justice and renders the order invalid. The Assessing Officer must give the assessee a reasonable opportunity to present its case before passing any adverse order.

Judgment Excerpts

By this Petition fled under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950, Petitioner is challenging the final Assessment Order dated 6th April, 2021 passed by National e-Assessment Centre, Delhi under Section 143(3) read with Sections 143(3A) and 143(3B) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the “IT Act”) and a Notice of Demand under Section 156 of the IT Act, as also Penalty Notice under Section 274 read with Section 270A of the IT Act for the Assessment Year 2017-2018. The court held that the failure to provide a show-cause notice and opportunity of hearing before passing the final assessment order violated the principles of natural justice.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed return of income on 30th March 2018. The case was selected under CASS. The Assessing Officer passed a draft assessment order under Section 144C. The petitioner filed objections before the DRP, but the DRP did not consider them as not filed within time. The final assessment order was passed on 6th April 2021. The petitioner filed the writ petition on an unspecified date. The court reserved judgment on 14th July 2021 and pronounced on 28th July 2021.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: 143(3), 143(3A), 143(3B), 144C, 156, 274, 270A
  • Constitution of India, 1950: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Assessment Order in Transfer Pricing Case for Violation of Natural Justice — Failure to Provide Show-Cause Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Renders Order Invalid. Petitioner's Objections to Draft Assessment Order Not Cons...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Appeal Against Demolition Order in MMC Act Case — Failure to Issue Notice to Owner and Lack of Personal Hearing Violates Natural Justice. Tenant in Possession Since Prior to 1987 Entitled to Hearing Before Demoliti...