Search Results for "Bombay High Court PIL Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Bombay High Court PIL Rules"

436 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 436 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Directs State Government to Expedite Land Allotment for New High Court Complex in PIL on Court Infrastructure. Need for Adequate Judicial Infrastructure Recognized as Fundamental to Rule of Law; State Obligated to Provide Suitable Premises.

22 Jan 2019

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by an advocate practicing at the Bombay High Court, seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State Governmen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers PIL on Infrastructure of Judiciary; Examines Primacy of High Court's Recommendations for Additional Courts. Court Notes State Government's Delays and Insistence That Its Own Views Prevail, Highlighting Need for 867 Additional Courts and Special Courts for Vulnerable Groups.

11 Oct 2018

This public interest litigation was instituted by a chartered accountant, Vihar Durve, raising concerns about the infrastructure of the judiciary in t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Entertainment Tax Exemption for IPL Matches — State Government's Policy Decision Not Interfered With. Policy Decision on Tax Exemption Upheld as Not Arbitrary Under Bombay Entertainment Duty Act, 1923.

24 Aug 2010

The petitioner, a sitting Member of the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the propriety of the decision...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Contempt Action Against Judges for Alleged Judicial Misconduct. Court holds that judges cannot be prosecuted for acts done in judicial capacity and that contempt of court proceedings cannot be initiated against judges for their judicial orders.

6 May 2016

The petitioners, Common Citizen of India (Common Man) through Rakesh Omprakash Agarwal and Peoples Rights Vigilance Organisation, filed a writ petitio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Converts Writ Petition into Suo Motu PIL over Illegal Construction on CIDCO Land; Appoints Court Receiver to Survey Occupants. Unauthorised structure built without any permissions on acquired land, despite repeated demolitions and stay orders, led the Court to take suo motu cognizance and restrain civil suits while considering demolition.

11 Mar 2024

The Bombay High Court, in a suo motu writ petition arising from a private writ, addressed rampant unauthorised construction on government-acquired lan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Construction of Commercial Complex Under PPP Due to Abuse of Process and Local Body Exemption. Construction by Municipal Corporation on Its Own Land Under PPP Exempt from Planning Permission Under Section 44 MRTP Act, and Delegation of Powers by Commissioner Under Section 72B Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act Valid.

12 Feb 2016

The petitioner, a social worker, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the construction of a commercial complex named Ranjeet Singh Market an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking CBI Investigation into Lavasa Hill Station Project for Lack of Credible Material. Petitioner's vague allegations against politicians and officials did not establish a prima facie case for criminal investigation under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

22 Dec 2025

The petitioner, Nanasaheb Vasantrao Jadhav, an agriculturist and advocate, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking a direction for registrati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Heard PIL Challenging Development Permissions for Star Hotel in No Development Zone. The Court Considered Whether UDD Approval Under Regulation 59(3) and Additional FSI of 1.0 Were Valid Under DCRs and MRTP Act.

29 Sep 2022

The case arose from a public interest litigation filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay. T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Additional FSI Grant Under DCR Regulation 33(1) — Petitioner's Lack of Locus Standi and Failure to Establish Public Wrong Leads to Dismissal of Petition Seeking to Protect Mill Workers' Housing Rights.

21 Aug 2017

The petitioner, Nitesh Mohanlal Doshi, claiming to be a social activist and environmentalist, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Bombay H...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Allotment of Land to Judges' Cooperative Housing Society. Allotment of land by MHADA to a cooperative housing society formed by judges was held to be legal and not arbitrary.

29 Oct 2018

The petitioner, Ketan Tirodkar, a citizen of India, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court challenging the allotment of...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)