Search Results for "BDA Layout Dispute"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "BDA Layout Dispute"

129 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 129 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petition Against Committee Order in Land Acquisition Dispute. Petitioners Claim Their Land was Deleted from Arkavathi Layout Acquisition and Challenge Committee's Order Dated 20-05-2024.

12 Dec 2025

The writ petition was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 20.05.2024 of the Committee constitute...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by Bangalore Development Authority Against Order to Compensate Land Owner for Unauthorized Use. Court Rules That Taking Private Property Without Acquisition Proceedings Violates Constitutional Right Under Article 300-A.

5 Nov 2019

The case involved a dispute over private land owned by P.G. Belliappa, which was taken over by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) without any a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Directs Re-Hearing in PIL on Park Land Encroachment Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Undertakings Recorded for Park Development and Slum Rehabilitation Under Karnataka Slum Areas Act; Review Petitions Allowed, Matter Restored for Fresh Adjudication.

21 Dec 2018

The petitioner, a federation of residents' welfare associations, filed a public interest litigation in 2006 alleging encroachment on approximately 3 a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes BDA's Cancellation of Site Allotment for Violation of Natural Justice — Purchaser from Original Allottee Not Given Hearing Before Termination. The court held that the cancellation order was passed without affording an opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice, and directed the BDA to hear the petitioner before passing any fresh order.

8 Dec 2017

The petitioner, Sri Manjunath Shetty, purchased site No.196/B in HSR Layout, Bangalore, from the original allottee. The Bangalore Development Authorit...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petitions on Lapsing of Land Acquisition Under Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013. Land Acquisition Proceedings Challenged for Non-Compliance with Provisions of the New Land Acquisition Law.

10 Mar 2016

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various landowners against the State of Karnataka, the Mysore Urban ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court examines claims of land acquisition lapsing under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 in writ petitions against Bangalore Development Authority and Mysore Urban Development Authority. The petitioners sought declarations that acquisition had lapsed under Section 24 of the 2013 Act, citing non-compliance with statutory timelines.

10 Mar 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Petitions Seeking Declaration that Land Acquisition Proceedings Have Lapsed Under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Multiple petitioners challenged notifications and sought relief under Section 24 of the 2013 Act in connection with acquisitions by Bangalore Development Authority and Mysore Urban Development Authority.

10 Mar 2016

Multiple writ petitions were filed by various landowners challenging land acquisition proceedings initiated by the Bangalore Development Authority and...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Seeking Declaration of Lapsed Land Acquisition Proceedings Under 2013 Act. Petitioners Claimed Acquisition Lapsed Due to Non-Compliance with Provisions of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

10 Mar 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Multiple Writ Petitions on Land Acquisition Lapsing Under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The petitions sought declarations that acquisition proceedings under the Bangalore Development Authority Act and Mysore Urban Development Authority Act had lapsed due to non-compliance with Section 24 of the 2013 Act.

10 Mar 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses BDA's Appeal in Property Injunction Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Finding of No Prima Facie Title. BDA Failed to Establish Ownership Over Suit Property as Revenue Records Showed Private Ownership, and No Acquisition Proceedings Were Proven.

1 Jun 2015

The judgment arises from two connected Regular First Appeals filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and dec...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)